Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 8, 2010 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 18 of 20 <br /> <br />8. #10-3444 CITY OF ORONO – SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS – ORDINANCE NO. 68, <br />THIRD SERIES <br /> <br />McMillan noted that Section 10 on Page 3 currently reads “All site reviews any I-Industrial,” and should <br />read “All site reviews in any I-Industrial…” The bottom sentence on Page 3 should also read “without <br />approval of a site plan…” <br /> <br />In addition, Page 4, Section 2, refers to modify different site design or intensity of use. McMillan asked <br />what a different site design would be as referenced in that paragraph. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated that would be like a door being relocated or other cosmetic changes to a plan. <br /> <br />McMillan asked would comprise an intensity of use. <br /> <br />Curtis stated an example would be to add an additional dental chair in an existing dental office. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if an application for site plan review would need to be done if a minor change is <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Curtis stated there would still be a site plan review and documents submitted, but that Staff would have <br />the ability to approve those minor modifications. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the exterior and/or interior of an existing building were changed, whether that would <br />require a site plan review. <br /> <br />Curtis stated if the use were intensified such that additional parking would be required, it would need to <br />come back before the City Council. <br /> <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 68, Third Series, an Ordinance <br />Amending Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code Concerning Site Plan Reviews, with the two <br />modifications discussed, and to adopt SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. , Third Series, An <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code Concerning Site Plan Reviews. VOTE: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT <br /> <br />None <br /> <br /> <br />8:00 P.M. – HRA ANNUAL MEETING <br /> <br />(The City Council proceedings were recessed from 9:25 p.m. to 9:28 p.m.) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 02/22/2010 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 02/08/2010 [Page 18 of 20]