My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-23-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 9:57:32 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 9:57:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 23, 2000 <br /> • Hawn moved, Smith seconded,to table Application #2513, Connie Piepho, 540 North Arm <br /> Lane, with the understanding the Applicant will seek to reach an acceptable bond and <br /> agreement with the adjoining property owner to insure relocation of his well in the event <br /> the Applicant's primary septic site fails, and identification of a secondary septic site on the <br /> Applicant's property, and further subject to submittal of an accurate sketch depicting the <br /> location of the proposed pool and secondary septic site. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br /> (#2) #2551 THOMAS MICHAEL RANDGAARD, 2765 SHADYWOOD ROAD -CONDITIONAL USE <br /> PERMIT <br /> This application was not heard due to the absence of the Applicant. <br /> (#3) #2556 BARBARA AND COLLINS CAVENDER, HAVING AN INTEREST IN 1405/1395 REST <br /> POINT ROAD -VARIANCES, 7:00 p.m. -7:13 p.m. <br /> Barbara and Collins Cavender, Applicants, were present. <br /> Weinberger stated the Planning Commission reviewed this application at its January 19, 2000 <br /> meeting where the application was tabled to allow the Applicants time to revise their plans in order <br /> to comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit and address concerns regarding the lakeshore <br /> setback. <br /> The Applicants have submitted revised plans which reflect a reduction in total structural coverage to <br /> • 15 percent. The proposed setback to the lake is now 34 feet as opposed to the 30 feet originally <br /> proposed. The house would be located further from the lake if the shoreline were consistent across <br /> the full width of the property. Weinberger commented many other primary residences along this <br /> road are located at a distance comparable to the 34 foot setback. <br /> Weinberger noted the City of Orono currently owns and maintains a lift station on the property. The <br /> proposed location of the house creates the greatest distance possible on the lot from the lift station. <br /> Weinberger stated this application requires variances to permit structure within 75 feet of the <br /> lakeshore as well as variances to permit structure and hardcover within 75 feet of the lakeshore. In <br /> addition, variances to hardcover in the 0-75' setback is required and a variance to the street setback. <br /> The proposed residence will encroach 13.67 into the setback. <br /> City Staff is recommending approval of this application subject to the following conditions: <br /> A. The property has been developed and used as a residential property for many years. To <br /> complete the application it is a requirement the lots be combined to permit the construction. <br /> B. Most of the property is located within 75 feet of the lakeshore. It is nearly impossible to locate <br /> a house outside of the 75 foot setback requirement without building on the street right-of-way <br /> line. Other houses in the locality are located at comparable setbacks from the lakeshore. <br /> C. The City of Orono owns and maintains a lift station located on the property. The City has a <br /> regular weekly inspection schedule for lift stations. It is reasonable to expect a "buffer" between <br /> the house and the station based on regular inspections. The City of Orono is requesting an <br /> easement for the lift station. <br /> • D. The lot has a very limited building pad. Any new construction on the property would require <br /> setback variances. Because Rest Point Road is narrow, it is not possible to park cars on the <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.