My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-19-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2000
>
01-19-2000 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 9:42:25 AM
Creation date
2/24/2012 9:42:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br /> • (#2550 Charles Van Eeckhout, Continued) <br /> Kluth noted City Staff is recommending tabling this application until these issues are resolved. <br /> Van Eeckhout commented he would like the Planning Commission to act on his application <br /> tonight. <br /> Hawn inquired whether the ten percent slope for the driveway is an issue. <br /> Van Eeckhout stated that is not an issue. <br /> Smith inquired whether the members of the Planning Commission preferred six lots with a <br /> 24 foot roadway or seven lots with a 24 foot roadway. <br /> Stoddard indicated he preferred the six lots. <br /> Kluth stated based upon the conditions stated by City Staff, the developer may need to reduce <br /> the number of lots. <br /> Weinberger stated this is another application that will need to be extended. Weinberger stated <br /> City Staff would be comfortable with sending this application to the City Council provided some <br /> direction is given to the Applicant on the conditions he should comply with. <br /> Barrett noted the Planning Commission has suggested the developer consider reducing the <br /> number of lots to six on a couple of occasions, with the developer indicating he preferred to <br /> leave the number of lots at seven. Barrett stated the Planning Commission could vote to deny <br /> • this application, with clear direction on what the Planning Commission would like to see occur <br /> on this application. <br /> Kluth moved, Smith seconded, to recommend denial of Application #2550, 120 Brown <br /> Road South, Subdivision for Planned Residential Development, with a strong <br /> recommendation the developer consider reducing the number of lots within this <br /> subdivision to six in order to comply with the conditions outlined in the January 10, 2000 <br /> Planner's Report. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> (#4) #2555 HENNEPIN COUNTY, 3880 SHORELINE DRIVE,ZONING CODE AMENDMENT, <br /> CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES, 8:25 p.m. -9:20 p.m. <br /> The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br /> Guy Nowlan and Greg Chock appeared on behalf of Hennepin County. <br /> Weinberger stated the Hennepin County Transportation Department is proposing to construct <br /> a Hi-Arch gambrel type salt storage building at the maintenance facility located at 3880 Shoreline <br /> Drive. The present facility was constructed at a time when the property was zoned for <br /> commercial uses. However, that zoning was changed to residential in the early 1970s, thus <br /> making use of this property a legal non-conforming use. Hennepin County has made an <br /> application to the City of Orono requesting a code amendment that would allow a county <br /> maintenance facility to exist in the LR-1C zoning district as a conditional use. The LR-1 C district <br /> permits any conditional use that is permitted in the R-1A zoning district. <br /> • Weinberger indicated the property is presently used for salt/sand storage in the fall and winter <br /> Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.