Laserfiche WebLink
_ . <br /> O� <br /> � <br /> O O <br /> �'���-:- CIT`Y of ORONO <br /> � � � � <br /> � � � :�1� � <br /> �L � �,.�G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `4kESYi04 NO. °� � �. � <br /> �VHEREAS,the contractor proceeded to reconstruct the post and beam foundation <br /> of the structure, re-usin� the pre-existing posts and beams but reconfiguring them in a manner to <br /> provide a more stable foundation for the structure; and <br /> `VHEREAS, the reconfiguration of the foundation is considered as a structural <br /> alteration to the boathouse; and <br /> �VHEREAS,the provisions of Section 10.55,Subd.26(A)allow the continuation of <br /> a nonconforming structure as long as it is not expanded,changed,enlarged or altered in a way which <br /> increases its non-conformity; and � <br /> WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 10.55, Subd. 26(B) limit the structura� <br /> alterations or additions to any nonconformin�structure over its life to not exceed 50 percent of its <br /> value at the time the structure became nonconforming; and <br /> WHEREAS,the provisions of Section 10.55,Subd.26(E)prohibit the reconstruction <br /> of any nonconforming structure which has been des�royed to an extent of 50%or more of its assessed <br /> value, except in conformity with the provisions of Section 10.55; and <br /> `VHEREAS,the City has determined that the boathouse became nonconforming on <br /> January 1, 1975 and had an estimated value at that time of approximately�1,200; and <br /> `VHEREAS, the value of the �vork done by the contractor in relation to the <br /> foundation of the boathouse was declared by the applicant to be �505, as witnessed by an invoice <br /> for such work presented by the applicant at the July 14, 2003 Council meeting. <br /> NO�V, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. The City Council finds that the boathouse�vas not expanded, chan�ed, enlarged or <br /> altered in any way�vhich would increase its nonconformity. <br /> 2. The City Council finds that the boathouse by virtue of its temporaryrelocation durin� <br /> renovation�vas not `destroyed' as that term is used in 10.55, Subd. 26(E). <br /> , ,. <br /> Page 2 of 4 . <br />