Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Wednesday, January 22, 2003 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#02-2854 KEVIN MANLEY, Continued) <br /> Gaffron stated that the lakeside stairs would lead to a dock system and that staff found that acceptable. <br /> The street side steps were not an issue. <br /> Fritzler stated that his questions had been answered and that he would support Option 1, as long as the <br /> City could be sure the work was completed as promised. <br /> Chair Smith indicated that she could support the construction of a boulder wall system versus keystone <br /> for aesthetic reasons. With regard to the inspector's comments, Chair Smith agreed, however was <br /> concerned about the future of the property. She also believed more trees were needed and that a timeline <br /> should be provided with ways to monitor the progress. <br /> Rahn asked if Option 1 restored the side yards. He indicated that if staff were satisfied with Option 1 as <br /> proposed, which restores the property the closest to the original state,he could support that as well. <br /> Gaffron stated that Option 1 would not restore the side yards as proposed. He believed that by restoring <br /> the original 3 or 4:1 slope,you might gain something,but cause the need for double retaining walls as <br /> reflected in old photos. <br /> While she could support Option 1,Zugschwert indicated that she could not see sacrificing the future of <br /> the property by requiring the side yards be restored. <br /> Chair Smith was troubled by the fact that,had the application for this grading and retaining wall work <br /> been before the Commission prior to being done, it would have been denied. <br /> In order to keep the shoreline as safe as possible,Hawn agreed that the City had now been put in the <br /> terrible position. <br /> Hawn moved to recommend approval of Application#02-2854,Kevin Manley, 1973 Fagerness <br /> Point Road,granting an After-the-Fact Variance and Conditional Use Permit for land alteration <br /> and hardcover within 75' of the shoreline as per Option 1 of the staff's recommendation,along with <br /> a schedule detailing the timeline for completion of various pieces of the project,plus additional <br /> planting of trees on the property,and subject to staff recommendations as per the staff report dated <br /> January 16,2003. <br /> Hawn asked if regularly scheduled inspections should be done during the process. <br /> Although he wished someone from the City could visit the site on a regular basis, due to limited staff, <br /> Gaffron indicated this realistically couldn't be done. <br /> Fritzler seconded the motion. VOTE: Ayes 6/1,Chair Smith dissenting. <br /> Chair Smith stated that she would like to see the property much more closely restored to its original state. <br /> PAGE 4 of 29 <br />