My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
05-09-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2016 2:46:51 PM
Creation date
5/26/2016 2:46:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 13 of 28 <br /> <br />10. #16-3822 LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST – <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT/RPUD REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />(continued) <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City will be redoing the Comprehensive Plan in 2018 and that Orono guided these <br />properties for higher density in order to make the required density. McMillan stated she cannot say that <br />Phase II will be a solution to the density question. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would like to pencil in a western access in case the landfill site can be mitigated and <br />that perhaps having just one access at this point will work but the plan will need to be redone. McMillan <br />stated the turn lanes will also be expensive to construct. <br /> <br />Walsh commented the developer may not want to go ahead with the development given the expense of <br />the turn lanes. <br /> <br />Cornick asked if there are any negative impacts on water or sewer going that direction if there is no phase <br />two. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City will be extending the sewer and water lines to this site for Phase I. <br />Gaffron stated from a capacity standpoint, whether it is 27 units or 47 units, that system will be able to <br />handle them and that it probably is simply a matter of a bigger pump. Gaffron stated the system will <br />probably end at the lower end with a lift station that will pump everything to the east. <br /> <br />Ben Wickstrom, Lakewest Development, asked if the density on this site is different from the three units <br />per acre. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the three units per acre is the density overall for the City, which is different from the <br />density that was guided for this site. <br /> <br />Wickstrom stated as it relates to Phase II, if the Council looks at the dimensions of the building footprint <br />to the west of the parking area, the building envelope that would need to be mitigated is almost exactly an <br />acre. If the first phase of the development encompasses 4.9 acres, by adding an acre, it would be pretty <br />simple math to say that 60 units total would be required to get to the six units per acre. Wickstrom stated <br />a 33-unit building would get the City to that density. <br /> <br />Wickstrom stated the Comprehensive Plan currently guides the overall piece for two 21-unit buildings for <br />a total of 42 units. Wickstrom noted that area was not initially targeted for higher density since it was <br />believed it was not buildable. Wickstrom indicated they have had environmental engineers who have <br />looked at the site and they believe it can be mitigated. Wickstrom stated in his view the first step is to see <br />if that can be guided and that they are willing to attach whatever number the Council would like to see on <br />that parcel. <br /> <br />Wickstrom stated as developers, flexibility in the density number makes it easier to design something that <br />works and that they are proposing 5.5 units per acre in the single-family portion. Wickstrom stated if <br />necessary, they are willing to design something for Phase II. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how deep the landfill is in that section. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.