My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-09-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
05-09-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2016 2:46:51 PM
Creation date
5/26/2016 2:46:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 11 of 28 <br /> <br />10. #16-3822 LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST – <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT/RPUD REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Walsh stated the letter in his view does not say a definite no to the two access points. Walsh asked <br />whether Staff has had conversations where Hennepin County is saying no but making the language softer <br />in the letter. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the discussion he has had with them verbally is that they do not want a second access, and <br />if the developer wants to propose a second access, Hennepin County will place a number of restrictions <br />on it. Gaffron noted Hennepin County will also be redoing this section of the road in 2019. <br /> <br />Walsh stated the other question he had relates to the second part of the site. Walsh asked whether that has <br />really been guided for anything. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it has not been considered as developable land. <br /> <br />Walsh asked what the density would need to be guided at in order for the City to be at three units per acre. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in his view the City would need to look at it as a single parcel. If there are 27 units on 5.5 <br />acres, that would result in approximately five units per acre. Gaffron stated it would not be easy to get to <br />ten units per acre without having a fair amount of apartments. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view that number would be helpful to the Council before the City goes looking at <br />other sites. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Staff can take a look at that. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if the City should get a firm answer from the Metropolitan Council on the density prior to <br />the applicant redesigning their plans. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there are two things the City is looking at. The first is how big the building needs to be in <br />order to get to the existing 10 to 15 guided density on the site. If that portion of the site is not developed, <br />the City will need to look at what it takes to get to three units. Gaffron indicated Staff will need to look at <br />that. <br /> <br />McMillan stated two of the biggest issues she has had with the two buildings on the site is that it is out in <br />the middle of nowhere and that it is not clear whether the site can be mitigated. McMillan stated in her <br />view having people purchase $600,000 homes on the other parcel and then in five years construct two <br />multi-family homes would result in a number of people being upset. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether Hennepin County would require the developer to pay for the turn lanes as well <br />as construct them. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that is his expectation. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is not sure if there is enough right-of-way to construct the turn lanes but the <br />developer will likely need to pay for those, which will result in additional expenses to the developer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.