My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3472
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 3400 - 3499 (March 14, 1994 - November 28, 1994)
>
Resolution 3472
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2020 10:58:03 AM
Creation date
5/26/2016 1:45:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. o <br /> 410 CITY of ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL y <br /> `1 , A, NO. 3 4 6 2 <br /> t N <br /> l <br /> �9k'ESI;�g� <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on September 19, <br /> 1994, and recommended approval of the proposed variances based upon the <br /> following findings: <br /> A. A deck and railing have existed at this location for more than four <br /> decades. <br /> B. The deck and railing to be replaced are located 7.3' from the side lot line <br /> where a 10' side setback is required, and 65' from the shoreline where a <br /> 75' setback is normally required, and located lakeward of the average <br /> lakeshore setback as defined by neighboring residence structures. <br /> C. Replacement of the deck does not constitute a new encroachment into the <br /> side or lakeshore setbacks nor does it create a new view encroachment for <br /> neighboring properties. <br /> D. The proposed replacement does not constitute new or additional hardcover <br /> on the property, although the existing hardcover is in excess of the zoning <br /> district limits in each zone. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property <br /> right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> Form 5005 Disk Orono <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.