Resolution 2292 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. � c�t� o� oR;oNo � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � � NO. 2292 � ' • - • • C) As a result of moving the house, the 75-250' hardcover will be increased to 33.1� where only 25� is normally allowed. This . can be justified by the fact that the. majority. .of .drainage in the 75-250' zone does not.flow toward.the .lake .but .is .held in the basin area east of the house (emphasis added). D) The view encroachment caused by the proposed porch at the south end of the house is minimal. The effected neighbor to the south has submitted a Ietter of non-objection to the project. � E) The relocation of the municipal sewer Iine is feasible and will not cause any problems for the municipal sewer system. 9. In that same Resolution the foI lowing variances were granted: A. Per Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8, approval of excavation of new foundation and new • construction or structure within the 0-75' lakeshore setback areas where no excavation or new structure� are allowed. B. Per Section 10.22 , Subdivision 2 to approve 33.1 $ of hardcover within the 75-250 setback area where only 25� is allowed. C. Per Section 10.22; Subdivision l, the new principal structure shal 1 be placed 67 feet from the lakeshore and the lakeshore deck was to be placed at 59 feet from the lakeshore instead of the required 75 feet. 10. On May 13, 1987, the appYicants' contractor, D & R Construction, ' applied for a building permit for the new construction. The handout information attached to aIl buiYding permit applications incYudes a list of the necessary information required if certain improvements are proposed specifically the following is extracted from that hand out: Grading and Drainage Plans - where any changes in grade or drainage are proposed as a result of the construction, a grading and drainage plan must be submitted showing existing and proposed � contours or grades. Required for all projects. 11. The original information submitted with the building permit application included only the building plans. Neither the applicant nor the general contractor submitted grading and drainage plans . advising of any proposed changes from the existing grades. The north and west building elevations included in the building plans would suggest no changes in grades as no elevations or contours were shown adjacent to each building elevation which is considered standard practice for architects in the preparation of building plans. Page 4 of 13