My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2268
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 2200 - 2299 (June 8, 1987 - November 23, 1987)
>
Resolution 2268
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2016 10:52:54 AM
Creation date
4/29/2016 10:52:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
., • <br /> Cit� o� ORONO <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2268 <br /> � <br /> � � � A R�SOL[TTION G1tAA1TYNG <br /> A VARIAiNC$ TO <br /> � M[TNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIOI� 10.23, SQBDI�ISION 6 (B) <br /> FILE #1195 <br /> , WH�REAS, Bob Kost (hereinafter "the applicant") has an interest <br /> in the property located at 4760 Tonka View Lane within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter 11City") and legally described as Lot 6, Berquist & Wicklund's <br /> Addition . to Berguist and Wicklun.d's Park, Hennepin Gounty, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WH$REAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br /> . Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) to declare 4760 <br /> Tonka View Lane a buildable lot, consisting of 24,891 s.f. or 58� instead <br /> of the required 43,560 sef. . <br /> N06d, THER$FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> • ,_ l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1195. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. . <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> September 8, 1987 and recommended approval of the proposed variance <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> A) A recommendation for approval would ref lect consistency with <br /> prior lot size variances in the area. <br /> B) There is no other adjacent vacant land that can be combined <br /> to create conforming lot size. <br /> � C) City sewer is available and has been assessed against the <br /> property. <br /> : :�.�,.D) .•.. Hardcover. will; 'not, exceed 16� using the proposed site plan. <br /> E) Out of 19 lots in the area, 12 lots (63�) fall below the .60 <br /> acre lot size. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br /> • findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br /> City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the•proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. , <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.