Laserfiche WebLink
� . . - .. . . ._.___. o �� � �.�..� <br /> �- � . ,���P <br /> Cit of OR�NO l�� � <br /> s , �' a-�� <br /> • � /�' � <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2264 � <br /> � � � A RESOLDTION GRANTING <br /> VARIANC$S TO <br /> � MITIdICIPAL ZONING COD$ <br /> SECTION 10.22, SDBDIVISION 1 <br /> � AND SECTIOAi 10.23, SQBDIVISION 6 (B) <br /> . FILE #1184 <br /> WHER$AS, Gerald T. McCourtney (hereinafter "the applicant") is <br /> the owner of the property located at 1055 West FerndaYe Road within the <br /> . .. .. City of Orono (hereinafte.r "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> See Exhibit A, attached, (hereinafter "the property"); and . <br /> • WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for variances to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 and Section 10.23, <br /> Subdivision 6 (B) to permit the constructi.on of bathroam, dinette, and <br /> laundry room additions to the existing structure resulting in an increase <br /> of 1.5� or 279 s.f. of �hardcover within the 75-250 feet lakeshore setback <br /> area where only 25� or 3,968 s.f. if allowed and a side setback variance of <br /> 15 f eet• f or the bathroom addition that W�1 i encroach no f urther into the <br /> • existing substandard yard area than the existing structure. <br /> .NOW, THEREFORE, BE .IT R$SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS � <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning Fi1e #1184. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> September 8, 1987, and recommended approval of the proposed variances <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> A) Over 50� of the area of this property is located within the 0 <br /> to 75 feet lakeshore protected area. <br /> B) The 16,000 square feet of grassed lakeshore yard area <br /> . . provides.. �adequate treatment area for the hardcover on the <br /> property. <br /> C) The City has received no negative comments from the adjacent, <br /> most affected neighbors. <br /> • Page 1 of 4 <br />