Laserfiche WebLink
f .^� <br /> � / <br /> � ` <br /> � Cit� o� ORONO <br /> • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 2252 <br /> • - • • <br /> A RESOLOTION GRANTING <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MONICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.03, SQBDIVISION 15 (F) <br /> FILE #1056 <br /> WHEREAS, Olai Hanson (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner <br /> of the property lpcated at 1390 Railroad Avenue within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Exhibit A attached (Hereinafter "the property" ) ; and <br /> WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.03, Subdivisibn 15 (F) to permit the <br /> construction of a detached garage located 4.6 feet from the side lot line <br /> where a side yard setback of 10 feet is normally required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORTs, BE IT R$SOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> • Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1056. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-lA Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July <br /> 21, 1986, September 8, 1986 and August 17, 1987 and recommended <br /> approval of the proposed variance on a vote of 4 ayes and 2 nays based <br /> � upon the f inding that construction of the garage 4.6' f rom the side <br /> lot line will not to a significant degree infringe upon the- amount of <br /> sunlight falling •upon the neighboring property owned by Mrs. Golden. <br /> 4. The side setback encroachment of 5.4' is necessary to reduce <br /> the angle of vehicle� entry into the garage due to the close proximity <br /> ' of the existing house. • <br /> 5. Disturbed soils � in the former septic system location are not <br /> suitable for construction of a garage and are located such that t.he <br /> garage could not be located to meet the required 10' side setback <br /> unless soil correction measures are undertaken. • <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the <br /> • findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br /> City staff, comments by the appYicant and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />