Laserfiche WebLink
Property address: 2755 Copper View Dr, Orono Inspector initials/Date: RGP 3/17/14 <br /> 4. Soil Separation-Compliance component#4 of 5 <br /> 1996 ❑ Unknown Verification method(s): <br /> Shoreland/Wellhead protection/Food Beverage <br /> �odging? ❑ Yes � No Soil observation does not expire. Previous soil <br /> observations by two independent parties are sufficient, <br /> Com lianCe Criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local <br /> requirements differ. <br /> For systems built prior to April 1, 1996, and ❑ Yes ❑ No <br /> not located in Shoreland or Wellhead � Conducted soil observation(s) (Atracn boring/ogs) <br /> Protection Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous verifications(Attach boring logs) <br /> beverage or lodging establishment: <br /> ❑ Not appliCdble (Ho/ding tank(s),no drainfieldJ <br /> Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify (See Comments/Exp�anation) <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. ❑ Other(See Comments/Explanation) <br /> Non-performance systems built April 1, � Yes ❑ No Comments/Explanation: <br /> 1996, or/ater or for non-performance <br /> systems/ocated in Shoreland or Wellhead <br /> Protection Areas or serving a food, <br /> beverage, or lodging establishment: <br /> Drainfield has a three-foot vertical <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock.' <br /> "ExperimentaP; "Other", or 'Performance" ❑ Yes ❑ No IndiCate de ths of elevations <br /> systems built under pre-2008 Rules; Type IV <br /> or V sysiems built under 2008 Rules (7080. A. Bottom of distribution media 95.1' <br /> 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspector <br /> LiCense required) B. Periodicall saturated soil/bedrock 92.0' <br /> Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. S stem se aration 3.1' <br /> separation distance from periodically <br /> saturated soil or bedrock. <br /> D. Re uired com liance se aration' 3' <br /> Any "no"answer above indicates the system is •May be reduced up to 15 percent if allowed by Local <br /> Failin�to Protecf Groundwater. Ordinance. <br /> 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*-Compliance component#5 of 5� Not applicable <br /> Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No If"yes",A below is required <br /> Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No If"yes", B below is required <br /> BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design <br /> If the answer to both quesfions is "no'; this section does not need to be completed. <br /> Com liance criteria <br /> a. Operating Permit number: <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No <br /> Have the O eratin Permit re uirements been met? <br /> b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properly functionin ? ❑ Yes ❑ No <br /> Any "no"answer indicafes Noncompliance. <br /> Upgrade Requirements (Minn. Stat. § 715.55)An imminent threat to public health and sa/ety(ITPHS)must be upgraded, replaced,or its use <br /> discontinued within ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period if required by local ordinance. If the system is failing to protect ground <br /> water, the system must be upgraded, replaced, or its use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance. If an existing system is not failing as <br /> defined in law, and has at least two feet ol design soil separation, then the system need not be upgraded,repaired,rep/aced, or its use discontinued, <br /> notwithstanding any/oca/ordinance that is more stricf. This provision does not apply to systems in shoreland areas, Wellhead Protection Areas,or <br /> those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging establishments as defined in/aw. <br /> www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in alternative formats <br /> wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Page 3 of 3 <br />