My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#3117-variances-1992
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Concordia Sreet
>
1935 Concordia Street - 18-117-23-14-0013
>
Resolutions
>
#3117-variances-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:46:46 PM
Creation date
4/28/2016 1:52:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1935
Street Name
Concordia
Street Type
Street
Address
1935 Concordia Street
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
1811723140013
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
s <br /> ��� �� � <br /> - ii O O <br /> �� �b - CITY of ORONO <br /> �11�, _ � <br /> . �, <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��9kESH�4�'G NO.. 3117 <br /> 3 . The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> February 18 , 1992 and April 20 , 1992, and recommended <br /> approval of the variances as amended based upon the <br /> following findings: <br /> a ) The 15' high Iakeside banks shield the proposed deck <br /> from the views at lakeshore. <br /> b) TYfe lakeside deck will not encroach the average <br /> lakeshore setback determined by the closest projections <br /> of the decks on the adjacent properties . <br /> c ) Location of view windows of applicant' s residence, <br /> location of mature trees within the side and Iakeshore <br /> yard and locat�on of a house to the immediate south are <br /> factors which limit the locating of deck on this <br /> property. <br /> d) The proposed deck will meet the Minnesota Department o� <br /> Natural Resou�ces 50 ' minimum setback for ceneral <br /> development lake such as Lake Minnetonka. <br /> e ) Proposed detached garage shall encroach no closer <br /> within substandard street or side setbacks of current <br /> garage. <br /> 4 . The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply general �y to <br /> other property in tnis zoning district; that granting the <br /> variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions , <br /> light , air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to al leviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5 . The City Council has considered this app Iication inc luding <br /> the findings and recommendations of the P Ianning Commission, <br /> reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the <br /> effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 5 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.