Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD DECEMBER 13, 1993 <br />(#24) LASHER LANDING PUBLIC ACCESS - CONTINUED <br />Jabbour commented that he felt it was important to retain the fire access and he did not want <br />to vacate the easement. Mr. Jerome agreed that it was important to retain the fire lane. <br />Jabbour commented that if it is determined that the City does not own it, then it can be <br />condemned. <br />Craig Lundell said that they would prefer not to have a large sign that advertised the access, <br />although he concurred that the idea of retaining the fire road was a good one. Discussion <br />ensued regarding the type of sign and how it would be installed. Hun stated she felt a small <br />sign for notification to call a number would be the best, but did not want to have a large sign <br />on the gate attracting attention. The consensus of the Council was that a small sign with a <br />notice to call the City hall number to gain access would be appropriate. Kelley noted that if <br />the City is not involved then people wishing to gain access would go to the residences <br />adjacent to the gates to get keys. <br />Hurr moved, Goetten seconded, to allow the gates to remain with the keys being issued to <br />allow access to the public. She felt the padlocks should be placed on a chain to prevent their <br />falling into the snow. The sign shall be no larger than 8" x 10' mounted on the gates <br />notifying residents to contact the City to obtain keys. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />(#25) SCHEDULE REVIEW OF PROPOSALS FOR LEGAL SERVICES <br />Mayor Callahan commented he felt the firm of Holmes and Graven had a conflict of interest <br />because they represent the LMCD. <br />Discussion ensued regarding how to set up the interview dates. It was noted that pricing was <br />the reason for considering alternative representation, since the City has utilized the same firm <br />for the past 17 years without any lack of services. <br />Jabbour commented he felt the Council should consider this item during a work session. The <br />remaining Councilmembers concurred. It was decided this item should be placed on the <br />agenda for the January 4, 1994 work session scheduled to begin at 8:00 a.m. <br />(#26) LICENSES <br />Hun requested this item be pulled from the Consent Agenda because she wanted to know <br />why there was a kennel application for eleven dogs, and when did such a use require a <br />conditional use permit. Moorse responded that this particular application had eleven dogs all <br />kept in the basement of the home in kennels. Hun requested staff to ensure that this was <br />really the case, and felt a site visit was appropriate. <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded to approve the following licenses: <br />0 <br />0 <br />