12-11-1995 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 11, 1995 • ( #6 - 92084 Thomas McCune - Continued) The applicant said this was not discussed with the Planning Commission. It was his belief that the sewering would occur in the near future. McCune said the proposal for the two additions show what his overall plans are for the property, and now the plans are predicated on when sewering will occur. He asked that the resolution state that the additions could be constructed when either sewer or a conforming septic were in place. Goetten noted that the sewering of the area relies on a favorable decision by the Met Council. Callahan asked Jabbour if it was his desire that the draft of the letter of credit note that either septic or sewer occur. Gaffron noted that condition 93 refers to this request. Hun moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Resolution 93651 with amendments made to the resolution as noted that the additions could be constructed when sewer or a conforming septic were in place as noted in condition #3. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ( #7) #1958 LOUIS OBERHAUSER, 2405 DUNWOODY AVENUE, 3865 AND 3877 SHORELINE DRIVE - REPLAT - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND VARIANCES 0 The applicant was present. Mabusth reported that the application was for the preliminary subdivision of the replat of 3 substandard lots. Four structures have existed on the property with one having been removed. Lot 1 is 16,500 sT, and Lot 2 is 20,000 s.f. The lots do not meet the lot width standard nor the OHW or the 75' setback from the lakeshore. There is encroachment of the 0 -75' setback zone with a timber wall on Lot 2. A structural coverage variance would be required for the proposal for Lot 1 only at 15.16 %. Lot 2's structural coverage is proposed at 10 %. The garage is located at 20' from the street setback and is proposed at 10'. The existing detached garage encroaches into the right of way 6'. Mabusth informed the Council that the Planning Commission would not approve any new development plan with hardcover in the 0 -75' zone. The Commission saw no reason to retain any improvements in this area. The recommendation for approval was based on no hardcover in this 0 -75' zone. The Commission approved the 10' side setback but would not approve any structural coverage variance. The applicant was asked to adjust the lot line accordingly. The hardcover on Lot 1 in the 75 -250' zone is proposed from 59.07% to 36.03 %, a reduction of 20.03 %. Lot 2 hardcover in this same zone exists at 36.7 %, is proposed at 33.23 %, for a reduction of 449 s.f. or 3.5 %. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed hardcover. 5