My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-1995 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1995
>
12-11-1995 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2019 9:58:16 AM
Creation date
2/14/2012 12:15:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 11, 1995 <br />• ( #12 - #2085 DNR - Continued) <br />Gaffron said this access plan was an opportunity to continue with a cooperative <br />agreement between the City and the DNR. If the City wishes to maintain some type of <br />control, the agreement can be used for a City partnership for maintainence or monitoring. <br />Jabbour said he thought the City would be mowing for a fee. It was noted that a charge <br />of $1 an acre for loss of revenue was all that DNR currently could pay legally toward loss <br />of taxes. <br />Gaffron commented that the draft approves the site plan and is open for a future <br />cooperative agreement. The City urges the DNR to discuss stormwater management on <br />the site with the Watershed District. Gaffron said the DNR will be using grass swales <br />with skimmers and a possible stormwater pond, which is satisfactory to the City <br />Engineer. The approval also suggests that the DNR not pursue additional access sites in <br />Orono. The findings point to fact that Orono has made sufficient provisions for access <br />with 5 marinas, swimming areas, and a landing in zone 1. <br />Jabbour expressed his concern regarding zone 1. He noted Orono's disproportinate <br />number of access points in comparison with neighboring cities. Jabbour said it should be <br />made clear that other cities located on the lake need to participate in providing access <br />points before any more are developed in Orono. Killien and Linnell both agreed. Linnell <br />said the DNR is "not gone forever" but gone until the other 13 cities have shown <br />Sparticipation. <br />At Jabbour's request, Gaffron said the two areas regarding zone 1 in the agreement will <br />be revised. Condition 93 of the agreement will read, "more than met obligation.", and <br />stop at that point. Item #5 referring to maintenance and operation, it was noted that if no <br />agreement was reached, the DNR would be in charge of the maintenance and operation. <br />It was commented that regarding Item #6, the DNR will work with the City regarding <br />approved landscaped. All parties involved, the DNR and City of Orono, are in <br />expectation that a cooperative agreement will be reached. <br />There were no public comments. <br />Linnell said he agreed with Jabbour regarding the winter parking. He has already <br />received several calls regarding this problem and people driving on the ice. Linnell <br />realizes that there is no undue hardship to park in the access area. Jabbour reiterated that <br />he did not wish for people to park on Maxwell Bay. <br />Jabbour congratulated Goetten on her excellent performance as chair of the Lake Use <br />Committee. He also noted the win -win type process the DNR was working under and <br />expressed his gratitude to the DNR and Dennis Asmussen. <br />Callahan agreed that the access project has been a cooperative effort. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.