Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD ON MAY 16, 1994 <br />( #15) #1932 ORONO SCHOOL DISTRICT #278,685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD - <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING <br />Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication <br />were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report. Neal Lawson was present <br />representing the Orono School District. Peterson inquired if the building could be <br />relocated to eliminate the variance, and Lawson responded that no matter where the <br />building was located on the site it would interfere with the fence or the ball fields. <br />Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing, and no one present wished to address <br />the Commission. <br />It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Berg, to recommend approval of #1932 <br />Conditional Use Permit/Variance for Orono School District #278 at 685 Old Crystal Bay <br />Road. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />( #16) #1934 RRH AND COMPANY, 710 GANDER ROAD - VARIANCES - PUBLIC <br />HEARING <br />Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication <br />were on file with the City. Gaffron noted that the applicant was not present and briefly <br />• reviewed the staff report for the benefit of the neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Rhetts, who were <br />present. Lindquist inquired if there would be a problem with the low depression in the <br />area where a driveway would go, and Gaffron responded that it would have to be filled. <br />Chair Schroeder noted this was a public hearing. <br />Mr. Rhetts noted he had submitted a letter which the Commission had, and that he was <br />opposed to using the existing septic sites but since staff recommended alternatives he felt <br />would be good for the environment, he would support it. Gaffron stated that if the <br />ordinance was changed to not require the setback variances requested, this application <br />will not be back before the Planning Commission. <br />It was moved by Rowlette, seconded by Lindquist, to table #1934 Variances for RRH <br />and Company at 710 Gander Road. Ayes 6, nays 0. <br />SKETCH PLAN REVIEWS <br />( #17) #1885 LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2675 SIXTH <br />AVENUE NORTH - REVIEW OF AMENDED SKETCH PLAN <br />Chair Schroeder noted that three members of the Planning Commission felt they had <br />conflicts of interest, and Peterson, Rowlette, and Berg left the table for this discussion. <br />• Mabusth reviewed the proposal. Terry Forbord, Vice President of Lundgren Brothers <br />Construction Company introduced John Uban, of Dahlgren, Shardlow and Uban. <br />10 <br />