Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD ON MAY 16, 1994 <br />( #12) #1929 ALONZO B. SERAN, III, 4099 HIGHWOOD ROAD - VARIANCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED) <br />directing of the water flow. <br />Lindquist inquired if the house could be moved closer to the lot line and Mr. Seran <br />responded that he had designed the house to allow more room for the mature Red Oak <br />and Basswood trees which exist as shown on the site plan. Nolan stated he felt that the <br />topography between the house and the lakeshore should be looked at by the City <br />Engineer because it was a very sensitive area. He commented that the City does not <br />normally allow any grading within the 0 -75' setback area. <br />It was moved by Nolan, seconded by Peterson, to recommend approval of #1929 <br />variances for Alonzo B. Seran, III at 4099 Highwood Road, to allow replacement of the <br />principal structure subject to approval of an integrated drainage plan. Ayes 5, nays I. <br />Rowlette stated she would have preferred to have discussed some hardcover removal in <br />the 0 -75' setback area. <br />( #13) #1930 MARGARET B. COST, 255 BROWN ROAD SOUTH - VARIANCES - <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />• Chair Schroeder noted that the Certificate of Mailing and the Affidavit of Publication <br />were on file with the City. Mabusth reviewed the staff report. Margaret Cost and Clark <br />Engler, the architect, were present. Nolan inquired what was the grade of the driveway <br />and Mr. Engler responded that it was 9 %. <br />Chair Schroeder noted that this was a public hearing. Adrian and Pam Kearney, 265 <br />South Brown Road, were present and Mr. Kearney stated they were concerned about the <br />driveway's setback from their property line and felt the applicant could reduce the size of <br />the house to meet the setback so the variance would not be required. They were also <br />concerned about the preservation of the trees located in the vicinity of the proposed <br />septic site which provide the only screening between their house and the proposed <br />structure. Mr. Kearney felt that a smaller house would require a smaller septic system. <br />They were also concerned about the driveway and he noted that the County Department <br />of Transportation had stated that they would like to see the existing entrance closed off <br />and a shared entrance created. He stated they would like to work with the applicant to <br />retain as much of the existing circle as possible and preserve some of the trees. <br />Discussion ensued regarding sight distances and possible means of access for both <br />properties. Chair Schroeder commented that the separate driveway had been approved <br />so the Commission could not address that issue, but he felt that the applicant and the <br />Kearney's could work together to resolve this. <br />Pam Kearney stated they feel there is a great deal of erosion which has occurred on the <br />east side of the property which may have created a bluff situation. She noted that the <br />