My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PC Minutes 1994
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1994
>
PC Minutes 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 10:15:22 AM
Creation date
2/10/2012 12:14:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />HELD MARCH 21, 1994 0 <br />(#7) #1911 ERNEST LEMMERMAN - cont. <br />It was moved by Lindquist, seconded by Smith, to table Application #1910 for Ernest <br />Lemmerman, 4620 Tonkaview Lane, for a lot area variance and a variance that would allow <br />encroachment of the bluff impact zone for 30 days to allow the City time to make a <br />determination of the interpretation of the bluff impact zone. Ayes 4, nays 3. <br />Rowlette was opposed to tabling the application because she felt the Planning Commission did <br />not effectively do its job by not bringing the bluff issue to Mr. Lemmerman's attention at the <br />beginning of his application. She felt a decision should be made according to what would be <br />reasonable for this lot and then consider how future bluff issues should be handled. Peterson <br />and Berg agreed with Rowlette. <br />Schroeder asked Lemmerman how the delay of 30 days would affect him. Lemmerman <br />responded that it would not hurt him but questioned if it would be a buildable lot and where he <br />should go from this point. Lemmerman stated he has already spent a lot of money for this <br />approval. Schroeder replied that, technically, they could not say the lot would be buildable. <br />( #8) REPORT BY PLANNING COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE <br />Rowlette reported that Council tabled the Tandem Properties application at their March 14 • <br />meeting. There was much discussion about drainage issues and Council felt the Planning <br />Commission had done a good job in addressing the drainage issue. The fact that the bike trail <br />must be located 30' in was never brought up at Planning Commission meetings, even with Park <br />Commission representatives present, which affects two lots. The bike path was not drawn on <br />any plans. Planning Commission members thought the trail would be in the road right -of -way <br />for Old Crystal Bay Road. Mabusth noted that an on -site meeting had been scheduled for 5:00 <br />p.m. March 21, 1994 and the bike trail issues would be resolved. Huff did not approve of the <br />cul -de -sacs because they did not meet code and roads should have been connected where <br />possible. <br />(#9) OTHER ISSUES <br />Schroeder reported that the joint Council /Planning Commission work session was very <br />productive with much discussion regarding the B -2 zone. <br />Meetings need to be scheduled to discuss the B -2 zone and amendment to the bluff impact zone <br />ordinance. Members preferred a 5:00 p.m. meeting and Gaffron is to schedule. <br />WA <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.