My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 12:11:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />NOVEMBER 15, 1993 <br />is Commissioner Nolan inquired how the applicant planned on doing the roof, and Mr. <br />q PP P 9 <br />Hertzenberg responded that it will be a new roof. Commissioner Nolan inquired if the <br />applicant had considered excavating under the new addition to increase the amount of <br />storage space available. Mr. Hertzenberg stated they had considered that, but the only area <br />suitable for excavation was that located under the proposed family room, and there was no <br />way to provide access to that area from the within the basement because it was separated <br />by a crawl space. <br />Chairman Schroeder moved Peterson seconded, to approve #1890 Variance for Craig <br />Hertzenberg at 115 Smith Avenue with the side yard setback as proposed. Commissioners <br />Nolan, Schroeder, Peterson, and Lindquist voted "aye ". Motion carried. <br />9. 1891 Brian and Barbara Ehalt /Don and Glee Jarnes <br />140 Leaf Street - Variance - Public Hearing <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth gave the staff report, and stated that Mr. <br />Jaynes has agreed to grant a 25' easement for future roadway expansion. She noted that <br />a street setback and the hardcover excesses in the 75 -250' setback area at approximately <br />6% are at issue. <br />Commissioner Peterson inquired about the curb cut and whether it would be realigned further <br />• to the north. He also inquired about the hill and the applicant responded that he would go <br />around it. Commissioner Lindquist asked if the applicant proposed to have a single garage <br />door, and Mr. Jaynes responded affirmatively, and noted that it would be a 16 foot wide <br />single door. <br />Commissioner Nolan inquired about the concrete patio along the back portion of the house <br />to the lakeside and whether the applicant proposed to remove it. Mr. Jaynes responded that <br />it was an existing patio, and he proposed to retain it. Chairman Schroeder stated he was <br />concerned about the increase in hardcover and he felt that at least a portion of the patio <br />should be removed to lessen the amount of the hardcover variance. Commissioner Peterson <br />commented that he saw the patio when he visited the site, although it was not indicated on <br />the survey. <br />Discussion ensued regarding the size of the patio and the amount of hardsurface coverage <br />on the site. Ms. Mabusth noted that the surveyor had not indicated the patio on the plans, <br />but it was approximately 6' x 15' in area. Staff felt that if 7.5 square feet were removed <br />from the existing patio it would be sufficient to bring the hardcover area into compliance with <br />ordinance requirements. Mr. Jaynes noted that closing was contingent upon approval of this <br />variance request. <br />Commissioner Peterson commented he did not have a problem with the applicant's proposal; <br />however, he was concerned about the accuracy of the survey which had been submitted. <br />• Chairman Schroeder commented he did not support increasing the amount of hardsurface <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.