My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1993
>
10/18/1993 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2012 12:14:44 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 12:11:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />0 HELD OCTOBER 18, 1993 <br />( #7) #1882 JOHN M. O SULLIVAN /O SULLIVAN S - CONT. <br />O'Sullivan then distributed to the Planning Commission a letter, dated October 18, 1993, to John <br />O'Sullivan from Officer Tomcheck who could not be at the Planning Commission meeting. <br />O'Sullivan quoted from Officer Tomcheck's letter: "Mr. Oman said that there could be <br />something in the building plans, but said to me that Tom Jacobs, the former building inspector, <br />may have placed a fire lane on the building plan, but he is unauthorized to do so. " O'Sullivan <br />noted he confirmed that with Don Bryce, Mound Fire Chief. He also wanted Bryce to explain <br />why he needed a fire lane for "life safety" because he felt they had a very safe facility. <br />O'Sullivan stated that on October 18 he talked with the State Fire Marshal's Office who stated <br />that if he were 150' off of the road, a designated fire lane would be required. He has three <br />access points and is less than 150' off the road so there is no issue with that. <br />Peterson noted that the 1987 building permit application and variance did require a fire lane. <br />O'Sullivan stated that the code the Chief quotes indicates that the fire lane can only be <br />designated by the Fire Chief, not a Building Inspector. Therefore, O'Sullivan would argue that <br />he never had a legal fire lane since it was improperly imposed by Tom Jacobs. <br />O'Sullivan closed with the following points: <br />1. They have gone over 5 years without a fire lane. <br />2. He contends they never had a fire lane because Tom Jacobs did not have the <br />authority to impose one on the site plan. <br />3. The plan was not approved by the Mound Fire Department. <br />4. Immediate competitors do not have fire lanes. <br />5. He feels he is being discriminated against with a required fire lane since other <br />businesses do not have this requirement. <br />6. Surrounding communities do not require fire lanes, including Wayzata, Plymouth, <br />Shorewood, Tonka Bay, and Excelsior. <br />7. Pictures were passed around of neighboring businesses that do not have <br />designated fire lanes. <br />O'Sullivan noted that he had called Don Bryce and asked why he changed his stance on the fire <br />lane issue, and Bryce had agreed there is no code and stated he did it to appease the police <br />department. O'Sullivan also indicated he found out that the letter had not been written by Bryce <br />but by Mike Palm, one of the Fire Marshals. <br />0 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.