My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
12-09-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:10 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 1:03:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MUM OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — DECEMBER 9, 1991 <br />( #5) #1697 JIM RIVERS, <br />1440 SHORELINE DRIVE — <br />AFTER— THE —FACT VARIANCES — RESOLUTION #3052 <br />Jim Rivers was present. <br />Moorse explained this is an application for after — the —fact <br />variances to approve a deck constructed 13 years ago without a <br />permit, which replaced an existing stone patio. <br />Goetten informed Rivers that from this point on the Council <br />wanted him to know that at anytime improvements are proposed on <br />lakeshore property, approval must be obtained prior to <br />commencement of the work. <br />It was moved by Goetten, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution <br />#s3052, application #1697 for Jim Rivers, 1440 Shoreline Drive, <br />to approve after — the —fact variances for construction of a deck. <br />Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( * #6) #1699 MICHAEL RENARD, <br />1185 TONKAWA ROAD — <br />RENEWAL VARIANCES — RESOLUTION #3053 <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to adopt Resolution <br />#3053 for application #1699 for Michael Renard of 1185 Tonkawa <br />Road, to approve renewal variances to allow construction of an <br />addition to his existing residence. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />( #7) #1701 PHYLLIS B. SPRAGUE, <br />3340 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — <br />VARIANCE <br />Phyllis Sprague was present for this application. <br />Moorse explained this is an application for variances requesting <br />a non — conforming residential use to be allowed on a commercially <br />zoned property. <br />Butler noted that the Planning Commission approved the use as an <br />accessory structure and as long as the applicant was aware that <br />the structure could never be used as a permanent dwelling, she <br />felt the proposal was acceptable. She noted the property could <br />never be sold as two individual dwelling units. <br />Sprague noted that the parcels would be legally combined. <br />Callahan asked what the property is zoned. <br />Mabusth noted it is zoned B -2. <br />7 <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.