My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-14-1992 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1992
>
12-14-1992 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:10 PM
Creation date
2/9/2012 12:52:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE.REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING <br />HELD DECEMBER 14, 1992 • . <br />ZONING FILES #1768 & 1786 — CONT... <br />Larson asked what, if any,- percentage of hardcover variance the <br />Council would consider. <br />Butler suggested the applicants revise their proposal, reducing the <br />hardcover percentage as much as humanly. possible to meet the <br />guidelines of the City. <br />( #10) #1775 ROBERT D. LUESSE, <br />3249 CASCO CIRCLE — <br />VARI'ANCES — RESOLUTION #3213 <br />Robert Luesse was present. <br />Mabusth explained, per the Planning Commission recommendation, the <br />applicant revised his proposal by attaching the garage and reducing <br />the' size of the garage addition now at 22'x24, but at the same <br />time made the structure' an oversized structure. The Planning <br />Commission did not approve the 6'x8' greenhouse addition. In <br />exchange for the two story 15'x16 1/2' lakeside addition, the <br />Planning Commission asked that the deck on the north side of. the <br />structure be removed and replaced with a smaller entry deck. <br />Mabusth noted the original proposal called f,or 37.2% hardcover and <br />the revised proposal is at 29.4 %. <br />Jabbour felt this proposal an improvement to the property. He felt <br />the applicant followed the directive of the Planning Commission <br />after their first meeting and should be allowed the green house. <br />Stephen Peterson stated the applicant did follow the directives of <br />the Planning Commission, but added the Planning Commission does not <br />get into redesigning an application at the meeting. <br />Butler felt the applicant should not be penalized for following <br />directions. <br />Goetten referred to the compelling letter sent by Mr. Luesse <br />expressing environmental concerns. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution <br />#3213, #1775 for• Robert D. Luesse, 3249 Casco Circle, approving <br />variances for a garage addition at 28x22', .and_ approving' the <br />6'x8' greenhouse, amending the resolution to reflect the approvals. <br />Ayes 5,.nays 0. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.