Laserfiche WebLink
�—� <br /> � ���� � <br /> �; 0 „ �\, CITY of ORONO <br /> �� � � Municipal Offices <br /> r� �,���1���, D., Street Address: Mailing Address: <br /> "�'�� ����������� ��� ,� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 <br /> .� �����`�,i ���'�;�C' Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 <br /> �kESH�g <br /> August l, 2011 <br /> Rose Anna Bradford <br /> 2480 Cobblestone Court <br /> Long Lake, MN ��356 <br /> Re: Follow-up to July 27 meeting <br /> Dear Rose Anna: <br /> This letter is to follow up our meeting last Wednesday, and to bring up some issues that did not <br /> come to light until after we met. A question was raised at our July 28 staff ineeting as to whether <br /> revisions to the plat of Stonebay would be subject to the current wetland ordinances rather than <br /> those in effect at the time of the original subdivision. <br /> The City Attorney noted that typically a new subdivision by state statute is not subject to any <br /> subsequent code changes for 2 years after final plat approval. The plat of Stonebay Sixth <br /> Addition was approved in June 200� and filed in November 2005, so the 2-year `grace period' is <br /> long past. <br /> The City adopted new wetland ordinances in August 2005 that eliminated the 26' setback <br /> requirement but established a requirement for wetland buffers of a width dependent on a <br /> `wetland protection classification', plus a 20' structure setback from the buffer. <br /> The City has not imposed the new wetland ordinances on the ongoing development of vacant <br /> Stonebay building lots; to do so at this time would likely render a number of lots unbuildable or <br /> very limited. There are no provisions in the Stonebay PUD Development Agreement that extend <br /> the grace period or that specifically allow development of existing lots under the wetland rules in <br /> place at the time the subdivision was approved. However, we intend to allow build-out of the <br /> remaining vacant lots under the original rules. <br /> The consensus among staff at our meeting Thursday morning was that revisions to the plat which <br /> expand the perimeter footprint of an individual lot or group of abutting lots into an adjacent <br /> commons outlot, should be subject to today's wetland rules. <br /> A question was also raised at that meeting regarding the appropriateness of going down the path <br /> of re-platting the perimeter boundaries of individual townhome lots to allow customization, <br /> regardless of the logic in support of doing so for any given site. <br /> The impact of this for adding a deck to the south side of 2480 Cobblestone Court is as follows: <br /> - A re-plat to expand the lot boundaries to accommodate a deck addition may encounter <br /> opposition from the standpoint that it would be precedent-setting for a townhome <br /> development situation ("if one person gets to re-plat, everybody will want to re-plat"). <br /> Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax (952) 249-4616 <br /> www.ci.orono.mn.us <br />