My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2016 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
03-14-2016 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2016 10:59:12 AM
Creation date
4/19/2016 10:57:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />9. #16-3803 STONEWOOD, LLC, ON BEHALF OF TASHITAA TUFAA, 1830 <br />SHORELINE DRIVE, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (continued) <br />Gustafson stated they would be willing to do some sort of a reduction and that it could possibly be as <br />narrow as 12 feet wide as long as they do some type of sub terrain work to stabilize the soil. <br />McMillan stated a narrower driveway would also look better and less commercial. McMillan stated if <br />Heritage Lane is the main entrance, that driveway should be a little bit wider than the other entrance. <br />--McMillan stated she does have a concern about some of the water running off the west side and then <br />down given the amount of asphalt. <br />Cornick stated based on the comments of the May, he would give Mr. Tufaa the house that he wants and <br />that they should go ahead with it. <br />Levang moved, Cornick seconded, Application No. 16-3803, Stonewood, LLC, on behalf of Tashitna <br />Tufaa,1830 Shoreline Drive, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution reflecting the changes <br />requested by Mayor McMillan. <br />Walsh stated in his view two curb cuts is not needed or appropriate and that the applicant could reorient <br />the garage without a problem. Walsh stated the applicant has chosen to push the design they want and <br />that he would not agree with the two curb cuts. Walsh indicated he still has issues with the 34 feet when <br />it should be 50 feet and that he also has an issue with hugging the lot line. Walsh stated if the garage <br />were in the front, they would have plenty of room for parking. Walsh noted his car has rear view backup <br />and that it is not necessary for someone to turn around. Walsh stated the applicants have chosen their <br />own orientation, which is their choice to do, but that he does not agree with it. <br />Printup stated the temporary construction access should also be included in the resolution. <br />Gustafson stated the temporary access will be used for the excavation and deliveries. The carpenters and <br />other workers will use the other road. <br />Printup stated he would like to hear more about the curb cut issue and why the new City Engineer <br />interprets the language a different way than how it was interpreted in the past. <br />Curtis stated in the past a homeowner applicant would make a request to the Public Works Director for a <br />curb cut. Curtis stated she cannot really speak to how that process happened but that it was happening at <br />a Staff level. When the City received a couple of inquires last summer about it, Edwards stated he would <br />be more comfortable bringing the issue to the Council. Curtis noted the application on Shadywood was <br />brought before the Council and that a few other applicants opted not to go before the Council to request <br />two curb cuts. <br />Walsh stated two curb cuts will impact the neighborhood more and that it should be brought before the <br />Council. <br />Gustafson stated they asked the question of the former public works director and was told it was not a <br />problem. <br />Page 12 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.