Laserfiche WebLink
To: Dorothy Hallin, City Clerk <br /> From: Michael P. Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br /> Date: September 22, 1997 <br /> Subject: Lot Line Rearrangement: PetersonlShemanek, 4385/4355 Chippewa Lane <br /> Peterson/Fritzler have acquired the taY forfeit parcel to the rear of their property and have signed an <br /> application for legal combination with their homestead parcel. The resulting parcel is L-shaped and <br /> extends behind Shemanek's property. <br /> They wish to move the boundary so that Shemanek gains the portion of the L directly behind him. <br /> This appears to be logical. Both resulting lots will continue to meet the requirements of the Zoning <br /> Chapter. Per the definition of'Subdivision' (11.03 Subd. 2.65)this rearrangement is technically not <br /> a subdivision and therefore is cxempt from the subdivision process. Per ll.10 Subd. 3B, we must <br /> certify that the subdivision regulations do not apply. The attached quit-claim deed has a place for <br /> you to make the certification. <br /> I assume there is an easement over the long narrow strip in favor of properties south of the Luce <br /> Line. I think such an easement is inconsequential regarding this proposed rearrangement. <br /> This memo serves as your authorization to certify this division/combination. <br /> ._:.�: <br /> � � <br /> �� � <br /> � , �, <br /> � t� � <br /> w <br /> i ��� ���:� <br /> �b �� <br /> �, � <br /> /" � . U � ' i <br /> � - <br /> ..'- U ,GI' <br /> -('o �� �p��- <br /> � <br />