Laserfiche WebLink
4 ' <br /> ., y�= �^.:.y.;� . . . . . � . <br /> � ���` _�_-�; k Cit�� o�� ORONO � <br /> � � i �;: � . . � <br /> ^r �_��'�, Y . ' ' <br /> � ' � ' Y�`� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �M <br /> �::: � •: NO. 2155 <br /> , -,: <br /> • - • � �; <br /> A RESOLUTION GR1�iNTING <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> ' SECTION 10.22, SIIBDIVISION 1 & 2 <br /> AND SECTION 10.24, SIIBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE #1121 <br /> WHEREAS, Kenneth Zullo (hereinafter "the applicant") has an <br /> interest in the property located at 3160 North Shore Drive within the <br /> , City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 4, Block 2 and Lot 3, Block 4, Crystal Bay Park, along with <br /> the adjoining vacated View Avenue, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> • WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.24, Subdivision 5 to <br /> permit the construction of a single family �residence on a lot 100' in <br /> width where 140' of width is required; and a variance to Section <br /> 10.22, Subdivision 1 to construct said residence in a location such <br /> that it wil 1 encroach 4' into the average lakeshore setback zone where <br /> no encroachment is normally allowed; and a variance to Section 10.22, <br /> : Subdivision 2 to al low hardcover in the 75-250' lakeshore setba�k zone <br /> in excess of the 25$ hardcover normal ly al lowed. <br /> NOW, TH�REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> • FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1121. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family Lakeshore <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> ' March 16, 1987, and recommended the following: <br /> A) Approval of the lot width variance finding that the <br /> property contains an existing residence that will be <br /> • removed, that the proposed new residence can be constructed <br /> to meet the minimum side setback requirements, and that no <br /> additional land is available to make this a more conforming <br /> lot. <br /> , � Page 1 of 6 <br />