Laserfiche WebLink
. r J 'Y • <br /> � ;���� ���t:�y � c�ty o� oR,oNo <br /> � <br /> • ry^ <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � <br /> � �"� NO. 212 3 <br /> • - • • <br /> � <br /> 5. Prior to December 19, 1983, the City Council � always required <br /> that when two or more Iots were owned in common, each I.ot must <br /> individual.Iy meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Code <br /> before any of the lots can be built upon and that two or more <br /> substandard� Iots owned in common must be combined so that th,e <br /> resulting combined lot meets the r�quirementsof the- Zoning Code <br /> before the lots can be built upon. <br /> � <br /> 6. Upon completion of a 6 month City wide review of. the common <br /> ownership issue, on December 19, 1983, the City approved a pro- <br /> posed amendment of the municipal code that would permit aIl <br /> substandard undeveloped lots within the sewered areas of the City <br /> regardless .of the ownership of these I.ots, the same standards for <br /> review. <br /> � 7. The property is 16,748 square feet or 77� of the required <br /> • area. The property is consistent in area with 7 other developed <br /> ].ots within a total developed neighborhood of 33 lots. <br /> 8. The property measures 55 feet in Iot width and is approxi- <br /> mately 5 feet short of the narrowest Iots in the 33 lot Casco <br /> Circle neighborhood� at 60 feet. � . <br /> 9. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> . November 18, 1985, and a majority of its members recommended <br /> . approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following�- " <br /> findings: <br /> � A) No available I.and - Iots are developed on both sides of <br /> property. <br /> B) The property is served with sewer and water. <br /> C) A house and improvements can be constructed without the <br /> need for additional variances. . - <br /> D) By granting this variance there will be no negative <br /> effect on the public health, safety and welfare. <br /> E) By granting this variance it is consistent with the <br /> devel.opment of the area. <br /> - - _. <br /> • F) By granting this variance there should be no need for _ <br /> . _ future hardcover and setback variances. <br /> G) The special conditions applying to the parcel of land in <br /> _ question are pecuiiar _to such property or immediatel.y ad=: - - <br /> ;: _:_., _ _ . <br /> joining property. _ . . ____. <br /> - Paae 2 �f 6 _ <br />