Resolution 2104 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. , . � ' � N S ..x Clt� o ORO O • RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L ;.�:�„: � NO. 2104 • � • • ' B) The neighbor whose view's would be most affected by the average lakeshore setback encroachment, John Kust of 3355 Crystal Bay Road, has submitted a letter of non-objection regarding the addition. C) The existing residence is located 77 feet from the lakeshore. The majority of the proposed additon in the 0- 75' setback zone is over existing driveway hardcover. Any comparably sized addition Iocated in the west side yard would result in the need for even more hardcover than is . proposed now, hence the proposed location creates a relatively minimal hardcover increase on the property. D) Existing hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone, excluding the roadway, is 1,152 s.f. or 41.9�, the majority of which is gravel driveway. The portion of the driveway located east of proposed porch can be removed to compensate for the portion of deck which wilY be over existing grassed yard • area, resulting in no net hardcover increase in the 0-75' zone. � 4. The City Council finds that a reduction of the addition to 13' rather than the proposed 16' W�i1 resu�t in an encroachment of 11' into the 0-75' setback zone, and further finds that a reduction of driveway width from the existing 24' to a 16' width, W�ii result _i.n a final �0-75' hardcover of 805 s.f. or 29.3�, a - _ reduction fr-Qm=-the existing 1,152 s.f. or - : . `" -- - - ` 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect � of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. � 6. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply general 1y to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrabYe hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantiaY property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive P1an of the City. • Page 2 of 5 �