Laserfiche WebLink
� ' � #04-3044 <br /> August 16,2004 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> Exhibit L—Photographs <br /> Exhibit M—Aerial Photograph <br /> Exhibit N—Property Owner's List <br /> Exhibit O—Plat Map <br /> Background <br /> The applicant's representative met with staff to discuss the proposed improvements to the <br /> property. It was determined at that time that the applicant would require a rear yard <br /> setback variance in order to construct an addition to the existing house. This was a direct <br /> result of misinterpretation of what frontage was considered the front. By Code definition, <br /> on a corner lot the lot boundary with the shortest street frontage is designated as the front <br /> line for zoning purposes. Although a substantial amount of improvements are proposed, <br /> staff has determined that because much of what is existing will remain, the project would <br /> not be considered a rebuild. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width <br /> LR— 1C Lot Area Lot Width <br /> � <br /> Required 21,780 s.£ ('/z acre) <br /> Actual 17,195 s.£ (0.39 acres) 119.80' <br /> Setbacks <br /> LR— 1C Required Existing Proposed <br /> Front (Minnie Ave) 30' 84' 62' <br /> Rear (west) 30' 15' 20' <br /> Left Side (south) 10' 62' 43' <br /> Right Side (Cherry 15' 21' 16.5' <br /> Ave) <br /> Structural Covera e <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 17,195 s.£ (0.39 acres) Allowed: 2,579.25 s.£ (15%) <br /> Proposed: 2,262 s.£ (13.2%) <br />