Laserfiche WebLink
.�U� J/ C�,��-'�`'�' .� ' " '�--. <br /> ;__- � <br /> j% ��; <br /> ;;��' , �' \`� <br /> ��� � �� 0��1� <br /> � ��� ���� CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ' r� �$�3�l�' � <br /> t � � i <br /> ���� �����''�`������" ��� ti' � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCiL <br /> l �,�� ,4rJ`1����^�`r°�C�/ <br /> �k;��;ui��i 0�� NO. 2983 <br /> ESH , <br /> A RSSOLDTION VACATING <br /> IINIISED PORTIONS OF <br /> A 14' AI�LEY WITHIN THS PLAT OF <br /> GRYSTAL BAY VIEW, <br /> H$NNLPIN COIINTY. <br /> CITY OF ORONO, MINNESOTA <br /> FILE #1653 <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation <br /> organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; <br /> and <br /> WH$R$AS, on May 2 4, 19 91 Jef f rey J. John son f i 1 ed a <br /> petition with the City of Orono requesting the vacation of <br /> certain portions of an unimproved alley originally dedicated in <br /> the plat of Crystal Bay View, legally described as follows: <br /> That portion of a 14' platted alley that abuts the south <br /> line of Lot 3 and the west half of Lot 2, Block 7, Crystal <br /> Bay View, Hennepin County, Minnesota (south half of Section <br /> 08 , Township 117, Range 23) ; and <br /> WHSREAS, after due published and posted notice a public <br /> hearing was held before the Orono Planning Commission on June 17, <br /> 1991 regarding said vacation and all persons interested were <br /> given an opportunity to be heard; and <br /> WHEREAS, after due standing and consideration, the <br /> 'riann�.ng C�mmiSsian r�co;r�me:�u�u appr�va� of the req„este� <br /> vacation and the Council of the City of Orono finds that said <br /> vacation, as proposed, is in keeping with the public interest in <br /> consideration of the following findings: <br /> 1. The existing 14' width of right-of-way would not meet <br /> required standards for development of a public road. <br /> 2. The location of a designated wetland within the right- <br /> of-way of the alley would prohibit the total development of <br /> the right-of-way for access purposes. <br /> 3. Based on the pattern of development and current <br /> ownership there is . no use of right-of-way for access <br /> purposes. <br /> 4. Any public interest in this unimproved right-of-way can <br /> be achieved with the granting of necessary easements. <br /> Page 1 of 2 � <br />