Request for council action zoning permit 2012001168

Home Browse Search

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: 21 February 2013 Item No. � Department Approval: Administrator Approval: � Agenda Section: Staff: Metanie Curtis, Planning &Zoning Coordinator� �,� Jesse Struve, City Engineer/Public Works Director�l'��" � : Item Description: Zoning Permit#2012-01168—S.Scott& Irene Standa, 3025 Casco Point Road Zoning District: LR-1C, One Family Lakeshore Residential—%: acre List of Exhibits: ExhibitA. Permit Application Exhibit 8. Submitted Survey Exhibit C. City Engineer Comments—Emails 11/28/12—11/29/12 Exhibit D. Additional Information Submitted by the Standas Exhibit E. Site Photos—Standa Exhibit F. Email From Dan Seidel Exhibit G. Site Photos—Annotated by Staff Exhibit H. Site Photos—Staff Exhibit 1. Orono Survey Requirements ExhibitJ. City Code Excerpts Exhibit K. Overview Aerial Photo -Staff Exhibit L. Survey(2004) 3015 Casco Point Road—Seidel Exhibit M. Survey(1999) 3025 Casco Point Road—Standa Exhibit N. Survey(2012) 3035 Casco Point Road—Hulbert Background On November 15`h Scott and Irene Standa submitted a zoning permit application for minor land alteration and driveway expansion. This request followed a zoning permit application request by Jay Hulbert,the neighbor to the immediate south,which involved land alterations and driveway/hardcover removals which appear to impact the Standas. Portions of driveway to be removed connect to the Standa driveway as indicated on the attached surveys and aerial photo. There is another portion of the Standa driveway which encroaches on to the Hulbert property that runs next to the Seidel residence on 3015 Casco Point Road. The City Attorney has indicated that, as the Standa driveway exists within an easement over the Seidel property, a permit application to expand the driveway and conduct grading on the Seidel property will require their authorization/signature on Mr. Standa's application. In response to Mr. Standa's permit application the City's Engineer,Jesse Struve provided comments and requested additional information to complete his review. In the email correspondence between Mr. Standa and Struve (Exhibit C), Mr.Standa questions the City's request for additional information. Rather than appearing at Public Comments, Mr. Standa requested an appearance before the City Council to discuss the City's survey requirements and how they may or may not be applicable to his permit request. At this point, Mr.Standa's request has not been processed as an Appeal of an Administrative Decision and no appeal fee has been collected.