Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> .. . , - _ . ._. .,:.: <br /> .,;, , , , <br /> ::� :•�.:�L'�1"r'S OF A PL4h?dING CO2✓.I�9ISSION MEETING HELD J '31.'qRy 16� 1978 - PAGE 4 <br /> � .� , � � � <br /> "` D:�vid S�n�er I;r. ' <br /> ; , Braun s attorney, and Steve JOE BRAUN <br /> , Plc�;:�;n, buyc-r of the property, and his aztorney, ,�p02 <br /> ;� Bob Schnell, �aere present. <br /> '�' , � (con' t) <br /> �::� The Commission was concerned that the proposed <br /> ' lots would be less than 50 ft, wide at the lagoon. <br /> N, <br /> ;F,. The 7_oning Administrator commented that the <br /> `;;� minimum Iot width requirement is l0U ft at the <br /> road and at the lakeshore. Mayor Van Nest <br /> co�nented that this requirement is a new policy <br /> � that has been adopted and will be part of the new <br /> ` '� ordinance. �_,..�,� <br /> �•-�•+ <br /> Commissioner Hassel stated a vari�,.o <br /> needed si.nce the lots do not me�h�e minimum <br /> lot width requirement at the lakeshore. He also <br /> commented that the Commission should be very 4 <br /> � � careful about approving this type of division • ,�. <br /> '` ' so that it will not just be causin more -�`''� <br /> � 8 problems. <br /> .� . <br /> Chairwoman McDonald stated she would have a hard <br /> : time not approving this subdivision when it conformed <br /> r� i � , <br /> to the old requirements before the policy�was changed. �� <br /> She referred to the letter dated March 18, 1975, ' �y <br /> ' � hy Howard Alton, Jr. 3025 Casco Point Road, stating <br /> � �' he had never seen Mr. Braun's property holding ' <br /> - any water. She also asked if the drainage plans <br /> had been submitted. . <br /> . r�- <br /> Y I"Ir• P"towman replied he had talked with Gordy Coffin <br /> ' an� �iar�c Muhich on this, adding that he thought . ' <br /> "� the Watershed District should be ask�d about this <br /> �; <br /> � also. . <br /> q=` . . <br /> Coimaissioner Wilson stated the protection of the <br /> " lake is one af the most important things to keep ' <br /> in mind. He felt the 100 ft. minimum lot width -��"'' <br /> requirement should apply in this case. <br /> � : <br /> � <br /> � The Zoning Administrator stated they would have to <br /> submit drainage plans which would have to be <br /> approved by the City and the Watershed District. <br /> He also stated there is a house on the lot as it <br /> exists now and with the subdivision there would be ' <br /> one more. � He expressed concern about the drainage <br /> � plans being the same as they were over one year <br /> a ago, adding that as the hardcover is increased <br /> �` � there is more runoff. <br /> � <br /> Commissioner Frahm felt the 100 ft, minimum lot <br /> requirement should appiy in tbis case based on the �� <br /> r<;„ fact the information is so old. <br /> ;., <br /> ��'; <br /> n y^ <br /> r�v�{SB1 <br /> .yd � <br /> �T <br /> e.'' � .���A .i,� �.�s <br /> #'���J <br /> F <br /> k, <br />