Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> } - _ .�,� .a -.E• ,,-� �� .�; ���;� :,F:. <br /> �� s4` -e '�4� <br /> ' �.fii,. <br /> a� . <br /> �^:>- _ <br /> ML";U?'ES 0? A PI.ANDiINC OC�*aSISSIOI� ME�TII�C HEi� NUYf?'l�ti 7, 1977 - PAGE 8 <br /> i;: <br /> �.,:� <br /> Mr• Durn w�as not present. The Planning Cocw�ission revie�.�ed EARL DORff <br /> v his pro�osat vhich consista oi the construction of a deLached 2►045 1tATErZr0lai POAD <br /> '� garage. A sarvey �ras not submitted and the exsct extent of the VARIANCE - FAONP S�:PRA <br /> �,; , <br /> �ariance could r.�t be determined. The Planning Coaanissioa ARJ1 b SIDE SEI'HACK <br /> t appeared to indicate approval oP the concept if all dimeasions 1JNDE�'ERMINI�.'D <br /> could be verified. The Planning Commlesion directed stnff to �329 <br /> inforn epplicant that at leaet a pa+-tial survey �+ould be <br /> � � necessary tefore the Planning Couwission could �aeite a definita <br /> �'�' determination of the extent of the verience. ' <br /> �;,� <br /> ���' Hassel r�oved, Hurr seconded, to table the applica+ion as <br /> � � .. <br /> � Mr. Durn xas not present. <br /> � rbtion - Ayes (6), �Y$ (o)• <br /> t _ <br /> Mr. Bie v�s present. The Planning Co�nission reviewed his DAVTD BIE <br /> proposal for aa electrical aho� an3 gitt�hobby shop area oa 3�96 SHORELINE DRIVS <br /> the ground Ploor xith reatal office space on the secoz�d Ploor. yp��g _ I,pT pr�p � <br /> The 7aning l�drainistrator advised the Planning Co:nmission that RFAR S�TBACK - CAhL��i�C: <br /> '�� the Pinal plane are sor,fsvhat dii'ferent tnan the �reliminary (B-5) SaE PIAlY & BUI] <br /> �'�� sketch presented to the Ylanniag Commission previously in that F.LE�/pTIpN pLAN pypRpy�7 <br /> �:;. <br /> x�: • variances ti,ould be necessary from both rear setback and ,�33� <br /> �' parking requirements. The final plans also indicated no <br /> � ;,; chauge in the originelly pro�sed acceas to County Road 15. _ <br /> �•:� The Planning Commission discuased the �roposed curb cut on <br /> �;� County Rosd 15. Several membere of the Planning Ccmmisaion • <br /> felt that access should be to �Javarre Lan�e. A 2etter submitted <br /> �'� by Henneptn County also indicated no direct access to County <br /> i Roed 15. . � <br /> p <br /> w.: <br /> �;' After some discuseion, Hassel mov�ed, McDonald seconded, tc� <br /> ' recou�end approval of a variance to the parking requiremenbs <br /> �:;'; and rear yard setback, an3 approval of site and building <br /> � elevation plans sub�ect to the folloxing: <br /> 1. Protection of landscape areas xith curbing or other ,,,;��': <br /> ;'� aPProved method . <br /> #:;�° 2. Acce�s come ofP Navarre Lene only <br /> �� <br /> ldcrtion - 1�yes (3), Nays (2) - Fiam,nerel, fiurr, Abstain (1) - Frahm. <br /> The Planning Coaunission slso revieved hazarfls reauZting from full <br /> leagth opened curb cut from Burl Tree establishment onto <br /> � County Road 1�. Recoisnended Council consider initiating some <br /> action 2or solution to existing hazardous sit;ia.tion at �'�is <br /> location. Tha Plaruiiz� Commis5ion took action on the folloxing <br /> wrk aession i`,.e2s; <br /> b <br /> } Steve P�ov-,.,an and hia e�torn�e xgre <br /> y present. ThiB subdivision ✓.fOE BRA�i <br /> ��'• pint vas ap;r�ve3 b Cauncil Jun� � Peyment 3p24 CA3pp ppINT RpAD <br /> ,.v. � Y 28, 1976, sub ect to <br /> `�' of the �ar� de;iication fee and engineer's approval or the SUBDMSION- R?-�Yl+LtL17 <br /> `t4 dr6iva�e flans. '�ae applicant nevar fulfilled Lhese raquire- �2 <br /> ma.:. <br /> .,M mants. Once agei�, t�.ay are requesting final appx�val. <br /> .�;�;-,. <br /> ,�;,yy�' <br /> Yo`F <br /> �x� <br /> r <br /> Y <br /> I �y� <br /> �w'k <br /> �'f � <br /> d �.":�. <br /> � . . ..:`Y,:_$.;3vsw �. <br />