|
_..�. . �...
<br /> .
<br /> . . .._..,. _ .. . .. ,. ..... .a,,
<br /> � .:�. . ��.:.�.. .,�,,...,� � . ._,.:�:.«� . ..:w�riwriii
<br /> � •
<br /> ;y �
<br /> T�: Planning Co�ssion � Co�mcil
<br /> ,.,.;�; _
<br /> FROht: Fiank Muhich, Zoning Ac�ainistrator
<br /> .;* �
<br /> �� [�TE: November 1, 1977
<br /> iL ��
<br /> � ��: Joseph Brain - 3024 Casco p,oint R,oad
<br /> ;� Subdivision (2 Lots) .
<br /> 4 Final Plat Approval (R�-E�2uation)
<br /> This prop�sal for a subdivision was first submitted in t�r�h of 1975 a
<br /> - wc wera accepting these types of requests as '�S• t which time
<br /> �; w�ere not required for simple subdivisions at tha�t��nsl���• �lic F�earings
<br /> �"'a
<br /> I was alway►5 very skeptical about the term "s' ��
<br /> I attended several w�orkshops and conferences wa�s I ableitosconvince � �itil after
<br /> theso procedures sl�uld be changed. tY that
<br /> . These shortcuts mako it i�apOssible for staff to prepare ade te
<br /> ; public hearings we lose the necessary input from t}a ����pu� �°�. Wi�t
<br /> � than not t�e all end up with headaches, s lic. i,hrc times
<br /> ; This is one of those boadaches:
<br /> Although this lot split was previously approved, I would suggest we rdcansider
<br /> ' before we finalize the project. T� original simple subdiyision s lI
<br /> ; submitted on Fobruary 25, 1975. pp cation was
<br /> ;
<br /> Without a public hearing� the plar�n
<br /> '� 1975. Cour.cil up�roved the split on I��Kh 25sio�75 oammended approval an March 17�
<br /> � was subL�tted). Y month after application
<br /> Alt1'wqgh A1 Olsa��S n� dated October 18 1977
<br /> F sh4uld evaluate the low drai,iage area and�soil condi�tionsc1Q�� Stat@s t,hat ti,,@
<br /> ; I Llcl�u� �ted Marrh 13 1975 . you will note on my
<br /> • . (�y enclosed) I indicated these same pofnts
<br /> the site rvith�vO}u�it�� �e low drainag@ are8 (copies enclosed). I also met on �
<br /> not interfcre with the nei�}�r� he felt the drai,nage co��d � ��ted so as to
<br /> several of the neighbon (copies enclos�j bt Neithertt eSPlannin�jectiasi from
<br /> the Cauncil addressed these points when they were brought to the�r a�ntlaai nor
<br /> , �' cenditia�s of soils is not the responsibility of the Plannin � fon. The
<br /> Council in sewered areas, how�ever. S armissian and
<br /> r time build• This is the resporisibility of staf£ at the
<br /> ` determinedlb �rmits are issued. Fauidations and s
<br /> `x y the soil conditions, If soil conditions�ar�e questi�able,swerrequire
<br /> �;;. soil borings Fu�d re�o��tions from engine�rs to Prev�ent failure of stYvctu
<br /> �� re.
<br /> �e �ar � �ree �ths after obtaining City approvai of the
<br /> ' Atr. Bra� and M�., pl�l returned with the necessa �rOp°S� lot s
<br /> � :;;�
<br /> f� approval (J�e 28 1976 Iy mYlar and haTdshells forlit,
<br /> �F park dedication fee of ,�,2,000)ande���r�roved the final plat subjoct to a
<br /> � � that time we hav�e heard nothin PProv�ed draina e
<br /> ' `" 8 Plans. -- Since
<br /> r ; g. Until now -- one year and four mont,hs later.
<br /> °' �y a� ��St�E approval of the final plat. Since the s •
<br /> e�lred and our policies and nrocedures have chan ed s �tu� of limitatians has
<br /> ' re-evaluation of the pro�Osal. g °��t. I M►ould suggest
<br /> ��
<br /> ��.
<br /> <},
<br /> �
<br /> s�
<br /> �;�� .���
<br /> ,�::
<br /> . }_
<br /> �_��,�
<br /> �, ,�;,�
<br /> ,„���
<br /> �;'`�
<br /> � ,.,4.�,
<br /> Yx:,,.: ���
<br /> ,J�
<br /> ,;,
<br /> ��
<br /> y�,.���
<br />
|