|
,} ` ' ', r���' � b�,-r=-. . I� '• �
<br /> , g, w.
<br /> . , � � . ., . , _, . „ .
<br /> . .. . . _ .
<br /> - , . . :
<br /> ,..
<br /> ,��.-> _ . ,
<br /> �'�
<br /> ..yr �'*y
<br /> � , •
<br /> �
<br /> � � . - " - , o k x�� ���` `*�"'� ���A'���,.a.�,
<br /> f�� d'��"�` , '� ry�';��f��
<br /> lots as to �ize and area be ��� `
<br /> policy of the City Council in�orderdtoY and :ubject to the
<br /> Welfare, sanitation and the like of thcpn�ighborboodeandhall
<br /> pr000sed lots should conform in axea to the existing lots in
<br /> the minimum buildingtlotpb�posed subdivision and conforw ko
<br /> Code. Ze$ established by the Zoning
<br /> 30. The ��� �
<br /> proposed lots do not meet the rainimum require- ,��� '
<br /> ments of the Zonfng Code. � ,
<br /> i �
<br /> 31. The proposed lots do not conform �
<br /> existing lot and existing lots in the area. 9enerally to the ,�;�.4 :
<br /> purportedly is a contract for deed vendee in arcontractnforh�
<br /> deed from Mr. Braun, has ar u�+ �
<br /> approved previously and thereforehany�required variance wasn
<br /> aPproved by such action. Mr. Plowman's argument fafls for '
<br /> each of the following reasonss • �
<br /> A• It fs the city's long-established � "' `'
<br /> final plat which has not been filed within on�licy Chat an ' � ��t ��
<br /> Y �.�� �. :�,-� ,
<br /> Office of the Hennepin County Recorder is void andrtha�subdf- ' �� t
<br /> vider must reapply under all existing ordinance�, regulations 1
<br /> {
<br /> an policies. This reguirement has been applied to numerou�
<br /> subdividers prior to Mr. Braun. �
<br /> �
<br /> 8• 1�r�Y variance whicb may have been
<br /> within one year after the a 9ranted expirts �
<br /> Orono 2oning Code which pproval pursuant to 532.371 0! tbe � �
<br /> providess ! s
<br /> "Variances shall expire one �:�
<br /> date of council a year after ths :.,���
<br /> change in use of the�V�l it not used. 11ny �
<br /> a new variance.• Property shall requir� �x�• ��� �
<br /> , ,
<br /> ' C. No separate variance application has b��n fi2ed by
<br /> Mr. Braun or by anyone else for thia
<br /> City Council may not approve of one atrthisttim�a th�retore tb�
<br /> 32. The reascns for an �
<br /> bY Mr• Plowman and Mr. eraun= y prior delay wers as admittad
<br /> A• The two of them could not agree ac to who vould �
<br /> the park dedication fee, the water assessment, the cost of sur- , `
<br /> VeYs► the soil borings, and other costs incidental to the 1
<br /> subdivieion procedure.
<br /> :�;�����
<br /> 8• Mr. Plowman signed a contract for deed for tht prp.. �'i��
<br /> poBed lot in 1975, prior to tht final lat a
<br /> to the filing of a record plat with th� Ofiic�rotatihe�H�nngor �
<br /> pin
<br /> ��� �,,fi•,,� .
<br /> -7- + �. `�����`..
<br /> . . . �,,.,�� r
<br /> . .b . . , :.� .
<br /> � .,. .�;...t
<br /> I�.
<br /> ,am6'"I
<br /> �° . .�.s �'6'N?r�'7. 4f .•i�jl'� I� � i
<br /> � .. � � . . , .. �` kr t'L�.$5�'� .,v�=� ' ' i
<br /> �
<br /> �', '�'��'i^,y 4'k .�.u r 1
<br /> � �. f s�� } �� r ^ 14y � . I
<br /> P� {� ��r alj a � ��:.
<br /> ' i i4 ��1tl �',rA'1t�t - h.
<br /> <.� `��e�����*,�", �A� �a� �
<br /> . ',y.�.
<br /> r;:a
<br /> `7f'
<br />
|