Laserfiche WebLink
; , . <br /> y S` � <br /> n� �• <br /> ( � <br /> 1, ., ` • <br /> ` Cit o� ORONO <br /> � <br /> • ,l � ` RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> '��4 NO. 2042 <br /> ,, x .,,� <br /> / 'K.. <br /> i <br /> A. �,� O . <br /> ,.�;;j->•.. <br /> 4. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> July 21, 1986 and August 18, 1986, and recommended approval of <br /> the proposed variances and conditional use permit for the <br /> accessory structure within Orono's Industrial District based on <br /> the following findings: <br /> A) To approve a variance to Section 2, Ordinance 13, Second <br /> Series: <br /> 1. The non-controversial nature and minimal scope of <br /> this application does not find the use in conf lict with <br /> the intent of the Comprehensive Plan nor with the <br /> purpose and intent of the Highway 12 Planning Study. <br /> 2. The application appears to be compatible with all <br /> zoning amendments considered with the Planning Study. <br /> 3. • The proposed use wi 11 have no negative impact on <br /> . � the health, safety and welfare of the public. <br /> B) Approval of conditional use permit and varianc�s for <br /> accessory structure: <br /> � 1. The detached structure is required by the P.C.A. <br /> � � for the storage of chemicals used in operation. <br /> : .. : <'_��;�';�:-� • <br /> � � ' 2: Stru�ture`_wi l l be �located� to rear of. main bui lding �� <br /> and screened by fenced area. � <br /> 3. Location of structure will not present hazards for <br /> the general public nor occupants of main building but <br /> will provide even greater safety measures for <br /> . applicant's overall operation. <br /> � 4. Accessory structure will allow applicant to clean up exterior <br /> storage area and comply with standards of Orono Ordinance 10.60, <br /> Subdivision 14 - Waste Materials. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on thi::: <br /> property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to othe�� <br /> property in this zoning district; that granting the varianc^ <br /> � would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air noi <br /> . . •. pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring properties; <br /> would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> • necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the appli- <br /> cant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br /> Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />