My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2026
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2000 - 2099 (May 27, 1986 - December 23, 1986)
>
Resolution 2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2016 3:46:16 PM
Creation date
3/29/2016 3:46:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, _� <br /> �., �� C�t� o� ORONO <br /> • Q� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> � NO. 2026 <br /> • - • • <br /> • A RESOLDTION GRANTING � <br /> A VARIANCE TO <br /> MUNICIPAL ZONING CODB <br /> SECTION 10.28, SQ�DIVISION 'S (B) <br /> FILE #1045 <br /> • WH�REAS, Arthur Bloemendaal (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br /> owner of the property located at 145 Cygnet Place within the City of Orono <br /> (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br /> Lot 6, Block l, Swan Lake Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WHER$AS, the applicant has applied to the City for a variance to <br /> Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to permit the <br /> construction of an attached garage addition to be located 27 feet from the <br /> • front lot line where a front yard setback of 50 feet is normally required. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: � <br /> . FINDII+��S <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1045. � <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Single Family Rural <br /> Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July <br /> 21, 1986, and recommended approval of the proposed variance based upon <br /> the following findings: ; <br /> A) Hardship is that the existing garage already encroaches into <br /> the 50' front yard requirement and any extension of the existing <br /> garage in line with the existing house will be closer to the <br /> right-of-way due to the curve in Cygnet Place at this location. <br /> B) No significant visual effect on the neighborhood. . <br /> C) The house was constructed when less restrictive setback <br /> standards were in effect for this area. <br /> � 4. The City Council has considered this application including the <br /> findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by <br /> City staff, comments by the applicant and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 1 of 3 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.