My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2021
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 2000 - 2099 (May 27, 1986 - December 23, 1986)
>
Resolution 2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2016 3:35:38 PM
Creation date
3/29/2016 3:35:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� ' Clt� o� ORONO <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . <br /> Q� <br /> � NO. 2022 <br /> � � � A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> A CONDITIONAL DSE PERMIT <br /> � PBR MIJNICYPAL ZONING CODE � <br /> S$CTION 10.03, SUBDIVISION 19 <br /> � FIL� #1040 <br /> WH$R$AS, William Ulrich (hereinafter "the applicant") � <br /> is the owner of the properties located at 1535 & 1595 Bohn's <br /> Point Road within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and <br /> legally described as follows: <br /> Lots 1 and 2, Lydiard's Park, Lake Minnetonka (hereinafter <br /> ' "properties"); and <br /> , WHSREAS, the applicant has appliecl to the City of Orono <br /> for a Conditional Use Permit to permit the extension of a sea <br /> wall along the lagoon shoreline of the properties per Municipal <br /> Zoning Code Section 10.03, �ubdivision 19. . <br /> NOW, THER$FORE, B$ IT R�SOLV$D by the City Counci 1 of <br /> Orono, Minnesota: • <br /> • FINDINGS <br /> l. This application was reviewed as Zoning File �1040. <br /> 2. The property is located in. the LR-1B Lakeshore <br /> T Residential Zoning Distr�ct. <br /> 3. On June 16, 1986, the Orono Planning Commission reviewed <br /> the application as proposed and recommended approval of the <br /> application based on the following findings: <br /> . A) Trapping and rip rock are not effective in <br /> combating muskrat problems. � <br /> B) A sea wal 1 is most acceptable method in controlling . <br /> erosion of low elevated shoreline bank areas consisting <br /> of soft peaty muck soils. <br /> C) Aesthetically desirable to tie in the whole lagoon <br /> area. <br /> D) The extension of the sea wall will present further ' <br /> erosion of the unprotected bank and low elevated lawn <br /> areas adjacent to lagoon from the muskrat infestation. <br /> • 4. The City Council has considered this application <br /> including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> Commission, reports by staff and comments of the applicant <br /> and the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. � <br /> Page i of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.