Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> � � _ V <br /> o � <br /> ' ���� , I'I"1' of ORONo <br /> � a ��1�� � <br /> FiESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � G <br /> ���kE YLpS�`'�' NO. � �: ;, <br /> S <br /> a. No further encroachment of the average lakeshore setback will result <br /> with construction of the lakeside porch in the same location, and <br /> therefore no existir:g lake views enjoyed by neighboring property will <br /> be impacted negatively. <br /> b. Placement of the existing hot tub on the roof of the lakeside porch, <br /> while technically an eneroach.inent, will not negatively impact views to <br /> the lake enjoyed by neighboring property owners due to the heijht. <br /> c. Tl�e current location of the hot tub is non-conforming in that it is <br /> within 10' of the side lot line. <br /> d. The deck and fence existing on the side lot line in place for use of the <br /> . hot tub, will be reinoved. <br /> e. Excess hardcover within the 75'-250' zone will be removed and result <br /> in a confoi-�ning percentage of 25%. <br /> f. The proposed roof overhan� attached to the principal stn.lcture aild to <br /> extend to 5' fi�om the detached jara�e will inerely be an extension of <br /> the existing non-confornling building-to-building setback existing <br /> between the house and detaclled garage. <br /> g. The proposed roof overhang will meet the required 10' setback to the <br /> side property boundary. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recominendation of the Plaiuling Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variances on the health, safety and welfare of the communit}�. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existin� on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other dan�er to neighbonng <br /> pxoperty; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> presen�e a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> Pa�e 2 of 6 <br />