Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT <br /> November 9, 2007 <br /> T0: Board of Directors <br /> . <br /> FROM: Judd J. Harper,Administrative Technician '� -- <br /> � <br /> SUBJECT: Eric& Laurie Berg Variance Application <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Eric & Laurie Berg, 2965 Casco Point Rd, have submitted a dock length and sitle setback variance <br /> application. Their residence has approximately 20'of continuous 929.4'shoreline and is located on Spring <br /> Park Bay in the City of Orono. Pursuant to LMCD Code, the attachetl public hearing notice was published <br /> in the 8/7/07 edition of the Lakeshore Weekly News and a public hearing was held on 8122/07. This public <br /> hearing was continued to 10/10/07, then 11/14/07 to allow the applicants adequate time to consider <br /> amending their variance application, working closely with the abutting neighbors and LMCD staff. Some <br /> members of the LMCD Board provided the applicants with direction on what they felt wouid be reasonable <br /> under LMCD Code which is summarized in the enclosed August 22, 2007 LMCD Board meeting minutes. <br /> The applicants have submitted a revised proposed site plan that depicts: 1) a 56' long straight dock, which <br /> narrows from 3.5' wide to 1.5' wide 27.5'out from the ordinary high water shoreline, 2) this dock is <br /> proposed to maintain a setback from the north extended lot line of 6,7' at shore and 5' at the end of the <br /> dock out 56' from shore, and 3)a 10'X14' boat lift on the south side of the 1.5'dock(presumably to store a <br /> restrictetl watercraft), and 3) a 0' setback from the southern extended lot line when the lift is installed 27.5' <br /> from the shoreline. Further details of the applicants request are outlinetl in the attached letter, dated <br /> 11/7107. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> To evaluate the proposed variance application, I believe that three LMCD Code Sections apply to it. These <br /> include: <br /> 1. Code Section 2.01, subd. 1 prohibits a person from using any area of the Lake outside an <br /> authorizetl DUA for docking and storage of watercraft. An authorized DUA is defined as"that area <br /> of the Lake which may be used for tlocks, moorings, boat storage, swimming floats, ski jump <br /> storage or diving towers, or which may be enclosed on three sitles for any of these purposes". <br /> These three sides are further defined by Code for maximum dock length and side setback <br /> requirements. LMCD Code requires setbacks from extendetl side site lines as follows: 1) the first <br /> 50' of the length of the DUA requires a 10' setback, 2) the next 50' in length of the DUA requires a <br /> 15' setback, 3) canopies require a 20' setback, and 4) side opening slips require a setback of the <br /> depth of the slip, with a minimum of 20'. For dock length, a DUA may extend the same distance <br /> into the Lake that there is 929.4' lakeshore frontage at the site, with a maximum distance of 100'. <br /> There are grandfathered provisions for setbacks (five feet) and dock length (four feet of water <br /> depth or 60', whichever is less)for DUAs that are 40' in witlth or less and were in existence in <br /> February of 1970. <br /> The applicants proposed plan is not contained within the DUA for this site for both length <br /> and side setbacks. To address this, the applicants have submitted a variance application <br /> from LMCD Code. <br />