My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5918
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 5900 - 5999 (January 11,2010 - November 8, 2010)
>
Resolution 5918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2019 11:15:46 AM
Creation date
3/29/2016 12:07:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 0 <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> SYt0 NO. 5 9 1 8 <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1C Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acre and a minimum lot width <br /> of 100'. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br /> February 16, 2010 and recommended approval of variances based on the <br /> following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 21,240 s.f. in area and has 20 feet in width at the <br /> OHWL and 26 feet in width at the 75' setback. <br /> b. The lot is substandard in width and a residence has existed on the property for <br /> many years. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width into <br /> conformity. <br /> c. The narrowness of the property at the lake presents an additional challenge to <br /> meeting the 10 foot side setback requirement. <br /> d. The hardcover variance level as requested is due to the narrowness of the <br /> property at the lake. <br /> e. A lake access stair is necessary due to the grade of the property at the <br /> lakeshore. <br /> f. The grade level deck will not adversely impact views of the lake enjoyed by <br /> neighboring property owners. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable <br /> hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.