Laserfiche WebLink
� d Cit o� ORONO <br /> , � <br /> ,; • . . <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> M � NO. 1983 , <br /> • � • • � <br />,;i <br />,•; ' <br />.� <br />., <br /> N • <br />;� . 1 <br /> '° •3. The Counci 1 reconf irms and once again adopts the specia 1 f indings <br />`..�j noted in Resolution #1886 for this permit review. <br />�, <br />� 4. Council wishes to restate the following specific findings in <br /> �' granting the permit for this unique property: <br /> i' ` � <br />�� a) The applicant's property consists of 2 separate parcels <br /> a divided by a public road. The properties can not be legally <br /> `� combined. <br />,' <br />`� b) The riparian tract was created in 1945 prior to the adoption <br />:, by the City of formal subdivision regulations, the riparian tract <br />' is substandard per current zoning standards. <br /> c) The properties are divided by a 66 foot public road right-of-• <br />�� way. . <br />, <br />�:� • d) The origina 1 owner of the property, Henry Skarp, created the <br /> riparian tract specifically to provide riparian access for .the <br /> ` interior Lot 6. <br /> e) The two properties have been recognized as one unit on a <br />` Certificate of Title for several years. � <br /> f) The City of Orono staff has considered the property riparian <br /> ' to Lake Minnetonka and has advised the previous and current owner <br /> ° as such. <br /> � � <br /> � g) The proposed private use of the unused portion of right-of-way <br />,; of Ferndale Road West wil 1 not conf lict with the public's use of <br />'�� the roadway or create hazards in the public use of the road <br /> { right-of-way. <br /> a <br /> � 5. The Council has considered this application, reports by staff, the <br /> written and ' oral comments of the applicant and applicant's agents and <br /> the effect of the proposed use on the health, safety, and welfare of <br /> . the community. <br /> C <br /> t <br /> � 6. The Council finds that granting a permit for the proposed private <br /> � use of a public property will not be detrimental to the hea•lth, <br /> ` safety, or general welfare of the public, nor pose a fire hazard or <br /> other danger to neighboring property, is necessary to preserve a <br /> : substantial property right of the owner; and would be in keeping with <br /> • the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> � Page 2 of 4 , <br />