My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-01191 - new structure
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Casco Point Road
>
3095 Casco Point Road - 20-117-23-34-0005
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2011-01191 - new structure
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 3:58:20 PM
Creation date
3/23/2016 11:43:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3095
Street Name
Casco Point
Street Type
Road
Address
3095 Casco Point Road
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
2011723340005
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> q�'�OEi�'S�1"Oa <br /> Memorandum ���� cap� ��;: Stant�ec <br /> 2335 Highway 36 W <br /> To: Darren Amundsen Project: Whipple Residence Date: 11-7-11 St.Paul,MN 55113 <br /> Tel 651-636-4600 <br /> From: Philip Caswell, P.E. Client: City of Orono, MN Fax 651-636-1311 <br /> www.stantec.com <br /> Re: 2011-001191 File No: 000139-11000-1 <br /> Project Review Information Summary: <br /> Project Name/Location: Whipple Residence Boulder Landscape Retaining Wall <br /> Developer/Property Owner: Whipple <br /> Design Engineer/Firm: Paul Schimnowski/Criterium-Schimnowski <br /> (MN #40126—Verified) <br /> Documents Reviewed: Engineer's Letter, including design/construction notes <br /> Site Plan (Date unknown) with Proposed Wall Layout <br /> Design Wall Cross Section <br /> Date Received: 11-2-11 <br /> Project Review Comments: <br /> 1. Project includes privately-owned boulder landscape retaining walls that will be <br /> installed at #3095 (street unknown). <br /> 2. Site drawing submitted shows the wall layout relative to boundaries, buildings and <br /> other site features. Deviation from this layout is not approved. <br /> 3. A geotechnical report and recommendations were not provided. Soil properties <br /> for the retaining wall were assumed in the design notes submitted. Engineer of <br /> Record requires field verification of assumptions. <br /> 4. Boulder wall design drawings were prepared by a professional engineer, licensed <br /> in Minnesota, and plan content appears appropriate to direct retaining wall <br /> construction. However, wall designer must clarify the following design <br /> parameters: <br /> a. Whether design includes driveway surcharge: <br /> letter, 2"d paragraph, states no surcharge was considered, 4th paragraph <br /> states that it was. Wall location appears to be adjacent to driveway. <br /> b. Minimum bearing capacity of foundation soils is required: <br /> Letter, 4th paragraph, states 1,500 psf allowable bearing capaciry is assumed, <br /> drawing states 2,500 psf is required. <br /> 5. Calculations for global/slope stability were not submitted. Applicant shall have <br /> actual site conditions evaluated by a qualified design professional to determine <br /> whether or not global stability analysis is required and ensure that in-situ soils and <br /> backfill design properties indicated on the plans are verified. Submit <br /> determination in writing. <br /> Submit documentation verifying conformance with design and construction <br /> requirements to City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.