Laserfiche WebLink
C�t� o� ORONO � <br /> • Q� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 1904 <br /> • � • • <br /> � 5. Prior to December 19, 1983, the City Council always, required <br /> that when two or more lots were owned in common, each Iot must <br /> individually meet or exceed the requirements of the Zoning Code <br /> before any of the Iots can be built upon and that two or more <br /> substandard Iots owned in common must be combined so that the <br /> resulting combined lot meets the rquirements of the Zoning Code <br /> before the lots can be buil.t upon. .� <br /> � 6. Upon completion of a 6 month City wide review of the common <br /> ownership issue, on December 19, 1983, the City approved a pro- <br /> posed amendment of the municipal code that would permit aII <br /> substandard undeveloped lots within the sewered areas of the City <br /> : regardl.ess of the ownership of these Iots, the same standards for <br /> review. <br /> 7. The property is 16,748 square feet or 77� of the required <br /> area. The property is consistent in area with 7 other developed <br /> • lots within a total developed neighborhood of 33 I.ots. <br /> 8. The property measures 55 feet in Iot width and is approxi- <br /> mately 5 feet short of the narrowest Iots in the 33 lot Casco <br /> Circle neighborhood at 60 feet. <br /> 9. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on <br /> November 18, 1985, and a majority of its members recommended <br /> . approval of the variances as proposed based upon the following <br /> findings: <br /> A) No avail.able Iand - Iots are developed on both sides of <br /> property. <br /> B) The property is served with sewer and water. <br /> � C) A house and improvements can be constructed without the <br /> need for additional variances. <br /> D) By granting this variance there will be no negative <br /> effect on the public health, safety and welfare. <br /> E) By granting this variance it is consistent with the <br /> development of the area. <br /> F) By granting this variance there should be no need for <br /> • future hardcover and setback variances. <br /> G) The special conditions applying to the parcel of Iand in <br /> question are peculiar to such property or immediatel.y ad- <br /> joining property. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />