Laserfiche WebLink
r`f <br /> ���, � . <br /> � : : , . <br /> r�, • <br /> � ;-i-4f� C�t� o� ORONO <br /> ,�,- <br /> • �n��� <br /> �.�:�: <br /> ,-�;���.-' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �Y�:° 18 81 <br /> • `�'..:-�� NO. <br /> :, .. <br /> �.���A_:;�; <br /> � • � • • � <br /> .:t,�,�'i�',��:;i: � <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> A VARIANCE TO . <br /> " MONICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTION 10.28, SDBDIVISION 5 (B) <br /> FILE #921 + <br /> WHEREAS, Van Eeckhout Building Corporation (hereinafter "the <br /> applicant") has an interest in the property located at 2135 Salem <br /> Court within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally <br /> described as follows: <br /> Lot 4 , Block 1 , Dickey Lake Addition (hereinafter "the <br /> property"); and <br /> WH$R$AS, the applicant has applied to the City for a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.28, Subdivision 5 (B) to <br /> permit the construction of an attached garage located 11 feet from the <br /> • northerly side lot line where a 30 foot setback is normal ly required. <br /> � NOW, TH�3REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> � • � FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #921. <br /> 2. The property is located in the RR-1B Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission has reviewed this application <br /> on May 20, 1985, and recommends approval of the proposed variance <br /> based upon the following findings: <br /> A) Applicant owns the adjacent property to the north and <br /> intends to develop that property himself. <br /> B) The location of the existing house and intended garage, <br /> 11 feet from the side lot line, wil 1 not have a significant <br /> effect, visual or otherwise, on the adjacent property to the <br /> north, based on the likely location for a house on that <br /> adjacent property. <br /> C) The applicant did not intend to locate the house and <br /> � garage 11 feet from the side lot line; the original site <br /> plan approved by City staff indicated a setback of 33 feet <br /> � from the side lot line; and the location 11 feet from the <br /> lot line is the result of construction errors which were not <br /> apparent until substantial work had been completed on the <br /> project. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />