Laserfiche WebLink
, _ <br /> � Cit of ORO1�0 <br /> S � � <br /> � ' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � NO. 1820 � . <br /> � • <br /> • ' • • . <br /> D) The property is se�erely restricted due to the Iot <br /> � size of only 0.4 acre in the 2-acre zoning district, <br /> and in that more than 1/3 of the property lies within <br /> 75 feet of the lakeshore. � <br /> E) It would be appropriate to recommend to the Councii <br /> that the plastic-underlain rock beds be made non- <br /> hardcover by removal or replacement of the plastic; � <br /> that the driveway backup apron be removed as it is not <br /> needed to avoid backing onto a street; and that any <br /> additional patio or screen porch on the lake side in <br /> the 75-250' zone be traded off with existing hardcover � <br /> on that side of the house. <br /> � 4. The Council recognizes that it was preferabie, from the � <br /> � standpoint of preserving or improving the water quality of <br /> Stubbs Bay, to create the Bayside Beach lots in place of <br /> allowing continued use of the property as a marina. The �. <br /> .. Council recognizes that wheri the City created this Iot and <br /> th,e other Iots within the Bayside Beach Subdivision, a <br /> number of hardships were also created, due to the smal.I lot <br /> ; sizes and the dedication�of land for an outlot to serve as . <br /> ' access and for the septic system drainfields. ' <br /> . 5. The Ci�y issued a building permit for the property in <br /> , � spite' of the fact that the house would take up most of the <br /> � allowed 75-250' hardcover on the property. <br /> 6. From a development standpoint, the property is too low <br /> for a basement to be feasible, which� necessitates a larger <br /> � structure above ground. � <br /> ' 7. The driveway backup apron has value from a safety <br /> � standpoint and should be allowed to remain. � <br /> 8. The sidewalks and proposed 10'x10' patio and screen <br /> porch in the 75-250' setback zone provide amenities which <br /> _ add to the livabil�ity of the property while contributing . <br /> only slightly to the hardcover percentage. <br /> 9 . The City Council has considered this applicatiori <br /> . including the findings and recommendatrons of the Planning <br /> Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant <br /> � and the effect of the : proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />