My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-14-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
03-14-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 9:14:07 AM
Creation date
3/17/2016 9:01:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
700
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 12/16/15 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 12/30/15 <br />120-Day Review Period Expires: 04/28/16 <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: March 14, 2016 <br /> Item No: 9 <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br />Name: Melanie Curtis mcc JML Planning <br />Title: Planner <br />Item Description: <br />#16-3803, Stonewood LLC o/b/o Tashitaa Tufaa, 1830 Shoreline Drive, Variances & CUP <br /> <br />Background: <br />In February the Council reviewed this application for a variance to allow a portion of the house to encroach <br />into the side street setback, a fence height variance, and a second driveway curb cut request. Also requested <br />are lot area and lot width variances; and a conditional use permit to export fill material. During the meeting, <br />the Council received comments from the public and the application was tabled following a discussion primarily <br />about the second driveway and the side setback. The draft minutes detailing the discussion from the February <br />22nd meeting are attached as Exhibit I. <br /> <br />Updates: <br />In response to the Council’s concerns with the encroachment into the street side yard, the applicant revised <br />the plan, reducing the encroachment of the footprint from 18.7 feet to 15.4 feet. They explored rotating the <br />entire home to be situated at the southern side setback, however this configuration would result in more <br />square footage of the home within the street side setback area, see Exhibit E. The applicant has withdrawn <br />the request for fence height variance. The side street setback variance request; lot area and lot width <br />variances; conditional use permit for grading; and approval of a second driveway curb cut continue to be part <br />of the application. The applicant’s continued request for the second driveway is driven by the narrowness of <br />the property; the applicant’s observation that many of the other properties in the immediate neighborhood <br />have a second driveway access; and their desire to provide for better maneuverability for guests, deliveries, <br />and similar. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Recommendation: <br />If the applicant’s amendments to the proposed plan satisfy the Council’s previous concerns, approval of the <br />side street setback may be appropriate. The Council should make a determination about the second driveway <br />for incorporation into the resolution. Staff recommends the following: <br />1. Approval of the lot width; lot area; and side street setback variances; and <br />2. Approval of the conditional use permit with the following conditions: <br />a. A haul route shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval and inspection prior to <br />commencement of hauling from the site. The property owner shall be responsible for <br />cleaning and repair of roadways for any adverse impacts; <br />b. Submittal of a detailed landscape plan which accomplishes the direction of the planning <br />commission and City Council. Landscape plan should include some infiltration basin, rain <br />garden, or rate control opportunity prior to the stormwater from the swale crossing <br />CSAH 15 to the lake; <br />c. Upon completion of the project an as-built survey shall be submitted reflecting <br />conformance with the approved plan. The site will be evaluated from an erosion and <br />sediment control risk perspective prior to release of escrow funds; <br />d. Existing trees should be protected from grading and trucking through snow fence or <br />similar. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.