Laserfiche WebLink
� O� <br /> � �: O CITY of ORONO <br /> �� <br /> ��� a L <br /> � , <br /> � � �'� '�''� � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � � ����� ti <br /> � , �'� N O. � � � n <br /> ��kESHO�'� <br /> NQV�', THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Cit�� Council of Orono, <br /> Minnesota: <br /> FINDING S <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File 12-3>45. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the One Family Lakeshore Residential District (LR-1 C) and is <br /> included within the shoreland overlay district which regulates hardcover based on <br /> distance from the OWHL of Lake Miruletonka. <br /> 3. The Applicants are proposinb to expand the existing home on the Propert5� to increase <br /> Iivable space, while simultaneously removing existing structure and hardcover such that <br /> the net result will be a 1.04% reduction (171 square feet) in overall hardcover. <br /> 4. In addition to the proposed 1.04% reduction in hardcover, the Applicants will be <br /> removing 365 square feet of illegal plastic under landscaping as a component of the <br /> proposed project. <br /> 5. The existing home is currently� twelve (12) feet beyond the average lakeshore setback Iine <br /> (the straight line connectin� the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on <br /> the immediately adjacent lakeshore lotsj. <br /> 6. The proposed addition will be four (4} feet beyound the average lakesnare setback line. <br /> 7. The Property is located at a point where the peninsula curves which results in the <br /> neighboring home's prominent lakeside view being oriented away from the subiect home <br /> and the proposed addition location. <br /> 8. The Plannin� Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on February <br /> 21, 2012 and unanimousl�� recommended approval of the requested variances based on <br /> the following findings: <br /> a. The proposed addition will not impact li�ht and air from reachin� adjacent properties.. <br /> and results in a home that is still conforming to structural coverage maximums. <br /> b. The proposed addition will not block prominent lake views from the lakesides of the <br /> neibhboring homes. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />